Search Results for "order vii rule 11"

206 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 206 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court Order Directing Valuation Under Bombay Court Fees Act in Will Cancellation Suit. Suit for cancellation of Will is not a mere declaratory suit and requires valuation under Sections 6(iv)(d) and 6(iv)(ha) of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1956.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit challenging the Will of Narinder Singh Chowdhary, who died on 21/01/2012. The plaintiffs sought a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Order VII Rule 11 CPC Not Applicable When Suit Not Barred by Law. The pendency of a probate proceeding does not bar a suit for partition and the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The appellant, Sri Venkatalingaiah Murthy, filed a petition for Letters of Administration (P&SC No.63/2011) in respect of the Will of late Sri K. Moha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rejection of Plaint in Recovery Suit as Time-Barred Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Claim for Damages for Short Delivery of Goods Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period Under Article 11 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal was filed by Reliance Industries Limited against the order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel, dated 21/3/1998, rejecting the plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Conversion of Writ Petition into Second Appeal in Order VII Rule 11 CPC Rejection Case. Dismissal of Delay Condonation Petition in First Appeal Must Be Challenged by Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC, Not Revision Under Article 227.

The petitioner, as plaintiff, filed a suit for declaration and injunction. The trial court rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) CPC....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action in Gadchiroli-Chimur Lok Sabha Constituency Dispute. Alleged Discrepancy of 62 Votes in Final Tally Does Not Constitute a Cause of Action Under Section 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The petitioner, Dr. Rameshkumar Bapuraoji Gajbe, contested the election to the 17th Lok Sabha from the Gadchiroli-Chimur Constituency as a candidate o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit Challenging SARFAESI Action — Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit Alleging Violation of RBI Guidelines and Fraud.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Bank of Baroda (applicant/original defendant) challenging an order dated 26/04/2018 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application, Rejects Plaint in Co-operative Society Recovery Dispute. Challenge to Attachment and Auction Orders Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 Barred by Section 163, Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Kalika Nagri Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit, a co-operative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, f...