Bombay High Court Allows Conversion of Writ Petition into Second Appeal in Order VII Rule 11 CPC Rejection Case. Dismissal of Delay Condonation Petition in First Appeal Must Be Challenged by Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC, Not Revision Under Article 227.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 208
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, as plaintiff, filed a suit for declaration and injunction. The trial court rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) CPC. The petitioner filed a first appeal with a delay of 18 days and applied under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay. The first appellate court dismissed the delay condonation petition but did not dismiss the appeal. The petitioner then filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. During hearing, the petitioner sought to convert the writ petition into a second appeal under Section 100 CPC, arguing that the dismissal of the delay condonation petition is a judgment in the first appeal and must be challenged by second appeal. The court examined the issue and held that an order dismissing a delay condonation petition in a first appeal is a decree and is appealable under Section 100 CPC. The court allowed the conversion of the writ petition into a second appeal and directed the registry to renumber it accordingly. The court also permitted the petitioner to file substantial questions of law.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Order VII Rule 11 CPC - Rejection of Plaint - Remedy - An order allowing an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is appealable under Order XLIII Rule 1(a) CPC; if the appeal is dismissed, the remedy is a second appeal under Section 100 CPC, not a revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. (Paras 3-5)

B) Limitation Act - Section 5 - Delay Condonation - Appealability - An order dismissing a delay condonation petition in a first appeal is a judgment within the meaning of Section 100 CPC and must be challenged by a second appeal, not by a revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. (Paras 4-7)

C) Civil Procedure - Section 100 CPC - Second Appeal - Maintainability - A second appeal lies against a decree or order passed in first appeal; an order dismissing a delay condonation petition in a first appeal is a decree and is appealable under Section 100 CPC. (Paras 5-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an order dismissing a delay condonation petition in a first appeal is amenable to revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India or must be challenged by way of a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the conversion of the writ petition into a second appeal. Directed the registry to renumber the writ petition as a second appeal and to accept the petitioner's substantial questions of law. The court did not decide the merits of the second appeal.

Law Points

  • Order VII Rule 11 CPC
  • Section 5 Limitation Act
  • Section 100 CPC
  • Article 227 Constitution of India
  • maintainability of second appeal against dismissal of delay condonation petition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (12) 147

WRIT PETITION NO.766 OF 2012

2019-12-17

Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.

2019:BHC-GOA:3578

Shri J.E. Coelho Pereira, Senior Advocate with Shri V. Braganza, Advocate for the Petitioner; Shri V.R. Tamba, Advocate for Respondent No.1

Shree Shantadurga Kumbhar – Juvekarin, Marcel Goa, Orgao Marcel, Ponda Goa, Through its present Attorney Shri Premanand Venku Naik

1. Shree Devaki Krishna Devasthan, Through its President Dr. Jaikrishna Lawande, 2. Communidade of Vagao/Orgao, Through its Procurador, 3. Administrator of Communidades, Central Zone

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for declaration, injunction, and consequential reliefs; rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; appeal with delay; dismissal of delay condonation petition; writ petition challenging the dismissal.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought conversion of writ petition into second appeal and to challenge the order dismissing delay condonation petition.

Filing Reason

The trial court rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) CPC; the first appellate court dismissed the delay condonation petition without dismissing the appeal.

Previous Decisions

Trial court order dated 08.11.2011 rejecting plaint; first appellate court order dated 13.06.2012 dismissing delay condonation petition.

Issues

Whether an order dismissing a delay condonation petition in a first appeal is amenable to revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India or must be challenged by way of a second appeal under Section 100 CPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the dismissal of the delay condonation petition is a judgment in the first appeal and must be challenged by second appeal, not revision. Respondent No.1's counsel agreed that the remedy is second appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

An order dismissing a delay condonation petition in a first appeal is a decree and is appealable under Section 100 CPC. The remedy against such an order is a second appeal, not a revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

Judgment Excerpts

The law is well settled: if an application under Order 7, Rule 11 of CPC is allowed, the plaintiff must challenge the trial Court’s order in appeal; if the application is dismissed, the defendant must file a revision. If we confine to the first appeal, if the plaintiff fails in the first appeal, he must take the first appellate Court’s judgment in a second appeal. The counsel on either side has felt that as the order of refusing the delay condonation is in a first appeal, it should be challenged in a second appeal, rather than in a revision, say, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed suit No.36/10/A for declaration and injunction. Trial court rejected plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on 08.11.2011. Petitioner filed first appeal on 19.01.2012 with delay of 18 days and applied under Section 5 Limitation Act for condonation. First appellate court dismissed delay condonation petition on 13.06.2012 but did not dismiss the appeal. Petitioner filed Writ Petition No.766 of 2012 under Article 227. During hearing, petitioner sought conversion into second appeal under Section 100 CPC.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order VII Rule 11, Order XLIII Rule 1(a), Section 100
  • Limitation Act, 1963: Section 5
  • Constitution of India: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Conversion of Writ Petition into Second Appeal in Order VII Rule 11 CPC Rejection Case. Dismissal of Delay Condonation Petition in First Appeal Must Be Challenged by Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC, Not Revision Under Art...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree — Pendency of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree Not Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court held that proceeding...