Search Results for "oral tenancy"

1115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Tenancy Dispute, Upholds Respondent's Sole Entitlement to Suit Premises. Court Holds That Rent Receipts Are Best Evidence of Tenancy and Appellants Failed to Prove Joint Tenancy.

The case involves a dispute over tenancy rights in a suit premises consisting of four rooms on the second floor of a building known as 'Haroon Manzil'...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Decree — Valid Service of Demand Notice and Application of Section 12(3)(a) of Bombay Rent Act Upheld. Tenant's refusal of notice and monthly tenancy established; Appellate Court's findings not perverse.

The petitioners, Gorakh Rambhau Chothve and Jalinder Rambhau Chothve, were defendants in a suit for eviction and arrears of rent filed by the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlady's Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Remand by Revenue Tribunal Set Aside Due to Failure to Consider Concurrent Findings of Lower Authorities. Widow's Right to Terminate Tenancy Under Section 31 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Upheld.

The petitioners, who are the legal heirs of the original landlady Smt. Bakulabai Rama Naikwadi, challenged the order dated 20th March 1991 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Delete Tenancy Issue in Suit for Declaration of Sale Deed as Void. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Decide Tenancy Issue When Ancillary to Main Relief, Not Exclusively Triable by Tenancy Court.

The petitioner, an 87-year-old person of unsound mind represented by the in-charge of an old age home, filed a writ petition challenging an order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Second Appeal, Upholds Tenant's Right to New Premises Despite Demolition of Old Shop. Tenancy Rights Were Held Not to Be Terminated by Demolition, and Doctrine of Frustration Under Section 56 of Indian Contract Act Was Inapplicable.

This second appeal arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff, a tenant in a shop block owned by the appellant-landlord. The parties ha...