Search Results for "notification quash"

1875 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1875 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Challenge to Land Acquisition Notification for Growth Center in Waluj Notified Area.

Four writ petitions were filed challenging the acquisition proceedings initiated by a notification dated 1st December 2010 under Section 126(4) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Drug Price Control Demand Against Pharmaceutical Company. Cream Vs. Ointment Distinction and Small Scale Industry Exemption Under DPCO 1995 Considered.

The writ petition arose from a dispute concerning the drug price control regime under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 (DPCO 1995). The first pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010051142020_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010138832018_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Central Excise Notification on Tobacco Products. Challenge to Notification No.3/2019 under Central Excise Act, 1944 Alleged Violation of Constitutional and Statutory Provisions.

A batch of writ petitions was filed by several manufacturers of tobacco and tobacco products under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Vessels Imported Prior to Notification. Condition No.82 of Notification 12/2012-Cus. Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Vessels Imported Before Its Effective Date.

The petitioner, The Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd., imported two vessels, 'Jag Rishi' and 'Jag Rahul', prior to 17.03.2012. On 17.03.2012, the Ce...