Search Results for "next highest bid"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "next highest bid"

203 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 203 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Sale Set Aside for Material Irregularity in Conduct of Auction. Order XXI Rule 90 CPC requires that sale be conducted with proper notice and opportunity to judgment-debtors; failure to serve notice and conduct sale at spot without prior intimation constitutes material irregularity.

10 Feb 2017

The appellants, Sri L. Nanjunda Murthy and Sri L. Nagaraj, were judgment-debtors in Execution No.3242/2014 pending before the XXXI Additional City Civ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favor regarding the cancellation of tender acceptance and forfeiture of earnest money.

20 Apr 2010

The appellant, Sunil Mantri Realty Limited, filed an appeal against the order dated 29.09.2009 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Declares Rule 6(3)(d) of Karnataka Urban Development Authority Rules 1991 as Ultra Vires and Unconstitutional — Refund of Auction Deposit Ordered with Interest. Rule 6(3)(d) allowing forfeiture of deposit without proof of loss was held to be in conflict with Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and thus ultra vires the Constitution.

2 Jan 2013

The petitioners, Shri K Babjan and K Sulaiman, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 6(3)(d) o...

High Court

"Deputy Commissioner Cannot Exceed Revisional Jurisdiction Under Karnataka Municipalities Act – Karnataka High Court Quashes Building Licence and Khata Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice"

21 Jan 2026

The petitioner challenged the orders dated 27.11.2013 and 02.08.2017 whereby the building licence granted in respect of the subject property was cance...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Orders in SARFAESI Proceeding. Borrowers Failed to Comply with Conditional Orders and Sale Certificate Was Already Issued to Auction Purchaser.

20 Dec 2023

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders of the Debts Recovery Tribuna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation in Public Works Contract — No Arbitrariness Found in Cancellation Due to Discrepancies in Bid Documents. The court held that the petitioner has no vested right to the contract and the authority's decision to cancel the tender was not arbitrary.

11 Mar 2022

The petitioner, M/s Rohini Constructions, a partnership firm, challenged the cancellation of a tender issued by the Public Works Department of Maharas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation in Food Supply Contract — Petitioner Not Entitled to Work Order as Tender Was Cancelled Before Acceptance. Court Held That No Contractual Right Arises Until Tender Is Accepted and That Cancellation Prior to Acceptance Does Not Violate Principles of Natural Justice.

12 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Shaik Abdul Khaliq, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award for Rabies Vaccine Supply. Performance Certificate Not in Prescribed Proforma Held Directory, Not Mandatory, as Substantial Compliance and Public Interest Justify Award.

3 Sep 2012

The petitioners, Bharat Biotech International Ltd, challenged the grant of a contract by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) for the su...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Pre-Deposit Requirement Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act in Appeals by Borrowers and Secured Creditors. The court held that pre-deposit is mandatory, computed based on the amount claimed in the notice under Section 13(2), excluding future interest, with adjustments for recoveries after filing the petition under Section 17.

23 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in a group of appeals, addressed the interpretation of Section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial As...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in Demurrage Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings Below. Clause 10(v) Held to Create Direct Liability for Demurrage, Not Indemnity, and Counterclaim for Option Cargo Damages Rejected.

21 Dec 2016

The dispute arose from a coal supply contract dated 18 September 1999 between the appellant, an Indian company, and the respondent, an Australian comp...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)