High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Writ Petition No. 2727 of 2018 Filed by Ruler of Ex-State of Jawahar Against State of Maharashtra and Others — [Details of Subject Matter and Outcome Not Available from Provided Text]
26 May 2025...
Search Results for "land revenue arrears"
623 result(s) found
Found 623 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal by Aided School Against Eviction from Natham Land for Unauthorized Commercial Use. Court Holds That Natham Land Reserved for Residential Purposes Cannot Be Occupied for Running School, Upholds Lease Arrears Demand and Vacation Order.
3 Mar 2025The writ appeal arose from the dismissal of a writ petition challenging an order of the Tahsildar, Bhavani Taluk, Erode District, determining lease ar...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Royalty and Penalty Imposed on IKEA for Earth Excavated During Store Development. Earth Excavated and Utilised for Backfilling, Levelling, and Internal Roads on the Same Plot Is Exempt from Royalty Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Read with Rule 46 of the Extraction Rules, 2013.
10 Apr 2024The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by IKEA India Private Limited and its authorised officer, challenging the demand for royalty and p...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Auction Purchaser's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor of Co-operative Housing Society. The Court held that the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 has jurisdiction to grant deemed conveyance despite pending civil suit challenging auction sale, as the society's right to conveyance is independent of the auction purchaser's title.
8 Apr 2024The petitioner, Ravi Jagganath Agarwal, an auction purchaser of land and building from the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai (MCGM) due to prop...
- 36
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MRT Order Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Tenancy Appeal. Delay of 30 Years in Filing Appeal Not Condoned as No Sufficient Cause Shown Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.
23 Oct 2023The petitioners, legal heirs of deceased original tenants, challenged the judgment and order dated 12/11/2021 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribun...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Auction Purchasers' Petition in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Overriding Effect of Section 26E Over MVAT Act. Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction Held Free from Prior Sales Tax Attachment Under Section 38C of MVAT Act.
12 Jul 2023The petitioners, Shailesh K. Bothra and Mukesh C. Karwa, were auction purchasers of a property sold by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. (pe...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction Against Dispossession. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Suit for Possession Based on Title Was Barred by Limitation.
13 Apr 2022The present First Appeal arises from a judgment of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, in S.C. Suit No.5551/1990, where the suit was decreed in favor of the...
- 53
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Vesting of Charnoi Land in State Under Madhya Bharat Abolition of Zamindari Act. Common Grazing Land Not Saved as Grove Under Section 5(f) Despite Presence of Fruit-Bearing Trees.
6 Feb 2019The present appeal arose from a suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by the plaintiffs/respondents concerning land recorded as 'Charnoi...
- 231
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Civil Court Decree in Land Revenue Auction Dispute — Auction Sale Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Civil Court Jurisdiction Upheld as Revenue Proceedings Were Void Ab Initio for Failure to Follow Mandatory Procedure Under Sections 145, 146, 147 of the Code.
14 Aug 2017The appellant, Syed Gurfan, was the original defendant No.3 in a suit filed by Ramdas Pande (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) seeking a dec...
- 72
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.
25 Feb 2015The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...
- 123
