Search Results for "khatha dispute"

85 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Khata Transfer in Property Dispute — BBMP Endorsement Quashed for Disregarding Registered Release Deed. Release Deed Must Be Given Effect Under Section 149 of BBMP Act; Writ of Mandamus Issued to Bring Khata in Conformity.

The petitioner, Sharmada B K, a practicing dentist, along with her parents, purchased site No.31 carved out of Sy.No.123 and 131 (old No.71) in Kathri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Removal of Encroachments on Siddapura Lotus Pond. Court Directs Authorities to Protect Water Body as Public Trust Asset Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Whitefield Rising Trust, a charitable trust, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses High Court Conviction Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Accused's Defence of Blank Cheque Misuse and Absence of Loan Disbursement Raises Probable Doubt, Rebutting Presumption Under Section 139.

The case involves a criminal appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant, ANSS Rajashekar, was accused by the resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Village Panchayath Resolution and Taluk Panchayath Approval for Lack of Notice to Petitioner. Resolution passed without notice to the petitioner, who is the owner of the property, violates principles of natural justice under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sri Malledevirappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a resolution dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Revisional Order in Land Conversion Dispute — Petitioner's Right to Change Land Use Upheld. Deputy Commissioner's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Satish Hegde, purchased four acres of land in Sy.No.58 (New Sy.No.141) at Singrahalli Village, Devanahalli Taluk, under a registered s...