Search Results for "junction"

236 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 236 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by BMTC in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Compensation Due to Multiplier Error. Tribunal's Use of Multiplier '18' for Deceased Aged 30 Years Held Incorrect; Proper Multiplier is '17' Under Sarla Verma Guidelines.

The appellant, Managing Director of Motor Claims Hub, BMTC, challenged the judgment and award dated 01.01.2022 passed by the XIV Additional Small Caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Grants Bail to NDPS Accused Due to Violation of Article 22(2) and Section 58 BNSS — Delay in Remand and Non-Furnishing of Arrest Grounds. Procedural Safeguards Override Section 37 NDPS Act Bar.

The petitioner, K.K. Roshan Kumar, was arrested on 28.12.2023 by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) in connection with the seizure of 11 kg of Methamp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Senior Police Inspector in Mansukh Hiran Murder Case - No Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy Under UAP Act. Court held that mere meetings and use of benami SIM card without corroboration do not establish criminal conspiracy under Sections 16, 18, 20 of UAP Act, 1967.

The appellant, Sunil Dharma Mane, a Senior Inspector of Police, was arrested on 23 April 2021 in connection with the murder of Mansukh Hiran and relat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Claimants awarded Rs. 9,22,400/- instead of Rs. 13,27,400/- after finding 25% contributory negligence on part of deceased Gururaj.

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 20.08.2015 passed by the Additional Court of Small Causes, Senior Civil Judge and MACT, Mysuru in MV...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Challenging Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Property Dispute. Court holds that appointment of arbitrator by consent of parties is valid and cannot be challenged under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment pertains to two arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioners in Arbitratio...