Search Results for "interest refund"

2362 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2362 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST with Interest for Zero-Rated Export Supplies Under CGST and IGST Acts. Petitioner entitled to refund of IGST paid on export of goods along with interest from date of shipping bill till actual refund.

The petitioner, Shri Charan Singh Surjit Singh Gujral, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty in Agreement Cancellation Case Due to Developer's Failure. Section 48(1) of Maharashtra Stamp Act does not bar refund when cancellation is for valid reasons and application is made within reasonable time.

The petitioners, Harshit Harish Jain and another, entered into an Agreement for Sale dated 30 August 2014 with M/s Krona Realties Private Limited for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of CVD Paid on Imported Mobile Phones Under Exemption Notification. The court held that the exemption notification No.12/2012-Customs applies to imports and directed reconsideration of refund claims subject to verification of unjust enrichment.

The petitioner, Micromax Informatics Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, imported mobile handsets during July 2014 to June 2015 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed GST Refund Despite Red Flagging of Exporter. Petitioner entitled to interest under Section 56 of CGST Act for period beyond 60 days from filing shipping bill, as red flagging does not justify indefinite delay.

The petitioner, Ms. Anita Agarwal, sole proprietor of M/s. Shanker International, is an exporter of goods such as Ethyl Alcohol Liquid Packaging Film ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Premium Paid for FSI Exclusion in Town Planning Case — No Development Commenced, No Benefit Availed. The court held that retention of premium without providing any benefit amounts to unjust enrichment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, Shri Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Smt. Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 February 2020...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Refund of Forfeited Auction Amount in SARFAESI Sale Due to Bank's Failure to Issue Sale Certificate. Bank's Failure to Perform Reciprocal Promise Discharges Bidder from Obligation to Pay Balance.

The petitioner, Sri Kalyanamurthy K., participated in an e-auction conducted by the State Bank of India (respondent) for the sale of an immovable prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Cyber Fraud Case — Directs Bank to Refund Rs. 76.9 Lakhs Under RBI Circular. Unauthorized Addition of Beneficiaries and Absence of OTP Constitute Deficiency in Service Under RBI Circular Dated 6 July 2017.

The petitioners, a director and a closely held family company, maintained a bank account with Respondent No. 2 for 15-20 years. On 1 October 2022, unk...