Search Results for "export time limit"

328 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 328 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Anti-Dumping Investigation in Seamless Tubes Case — Designated Authority Failed to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Before Terminating Investigation Under Customs Tariff Rules, 1995.

The petitioner, M/s. ISMT Limited, a manufacturer of seamless tubes and pipes, filed an anti-dumping application before the Designated Authority alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Repealed Penalty Rule Cannot Apply: The Supreme Court Upholds Application of Amended Rule in Excise Penalty Case

The Supreme Court of India ruled in favor of Pernod Ricard India (P) Ltd, holding that penalties for exceeding permissible limits of liquor wastage du...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging Withdrawal of Labour Welfare Cess Exemption for SEZ Developers. The court held that the exemption was a concession and could be withdrawn by the government, and the appellant had no vested right to its continuation.

The appellant, M/s. Primal Projects Limited, a company engaged in constructing and developing IT parks in Special Economic Zones (SEZ), challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge by CFS Operators to Customs Public Notices. Petition Under Article 226 Seeks Quashing of Notices Allegedly Imposing Unlawful Restrictions on Container Freight Stations.

The petitioners, comprising thirteen Container Freight Station (CFS) operators and thirteen individual directors, filed a writ petition under Article ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains MMRDA from Taking Coercive Actions in Writ Petition Challenging Penalty Demand for Construction Delay; Lease Deed Clauses on Time Limit and Additional Built-Up Area Interpreted

The petitioners, Raghuleela Builders Private Limited and Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Maritime Board Dispute Over Cargo Handling Charges. Court sets aside majority award directing payment at Rs.3 per metric tonne, remits matter for fresh consideration on applicability of 1995 or 1996 policy.

The Maharashtra Maritime Board (Claimant) filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in MVAT Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Natural Justice. Inter-State Stock Transfer Not a Sale Under MVAT Act, 2002; Reassessment Beyond 4-Year Limitation Period Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. United Spirits Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages, filed a writ petition challenging a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Bunker Fuel Sales to Vessels on High Seas Are Taxable Under Maharashtra VAT Act. Petitioners Challenged Assessment Orders and Recovery Notices Claiming Sales Occurred Outside State Territory and Were in Course of Export.

The dispute arose from assessment and recovery proceedings under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 concerning sales of High Speed Diesel (HSD)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets Applicability of Written Statement Time Limit to Counter-Claim in Commercial Suits. The Court Examined Whether the 120-Day Limit Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Applies to Plaintiffs' Reply to Counter-Claims Governed by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

This matter arose from a commercial suit for recovery of money filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respondents (defendants). The defendan...