Search Results for "exorbitant demand"

145 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Award Granting Wage Hike to Workmen Under Section 73(2) of MIR Act. Industrial Court's Findings on Comparable Units and Financial Capacity Upheld as Not Perverse.

The petitioner, M/s Diffusion Engineering Limited, a public limited company operating four manufacturing units, challenged an award dated 15-2-2019 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal in ESI Coverage Dispute - Section 2A and Regulation 10B Held Mandatory. Employer's Failure to Obtain Code Number Does Not Excuse Contribution Liability Under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

The appeal was filed by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 against the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit, Reduces Interest Rate from 23% to 6% p.a. for Money Lending Transactions. Court Held That Charging 23% Interest Was Unconscionable and Excessive Under Section 34 CPC, and Reduced It to 6% p.a. Simple Interest.

The plaintiff, G.R. Shet, proprietor of M/s Shet & Co., filed a suit for recovery of money against M/s Bawa Enterprises (a partnership firm) and its p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal Against Divorce Decree on Ground of Cruelty, Sets Aside Family Court Order. Isolated instances of verbal abuse and filing of false complaints do not constitute cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant-wife and respondent-husband were married on 20.5.1994 at Sumerpur, Rajasthan according to Hindu Vedic rites. After marriage, the wife re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petitions Challenging Eviction Decree Under Bombay Rent Act. Landlord's Bona Fide Need for Residence Upheld as Tenant Failed to Rebut Presumption Under Section 13(1)(g) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The petitioners, heirs of the original tenant Shankar Dagadu Pardeshi, challenged the concurrent findings of the trial court and appellate court decre...