Search Results for "excepted clause"

130 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 130 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anjalappa and Ashok, were convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in S.C. No.322/2012 for the murder of a person unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Share Entitlement. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Capital Contribution of Rs.50,00,000 as per Partnership Deed Dated 30.10.1992, Thus Entitled Only to 10% Share in Profits and Losses Until Expulsion on 18.6.2004.

The dispute originated from a partnership firm, M/s Selwel Combines, reconstituted in 1992 with plaintiff No.1 inducted as a partner under a deed stip...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Anticipatory Bail to Mother-in-Law in Triple Talaq Case — Section 7(c) of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 Does Not Bar Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 CrPC. Offence Under the Act Can Only Be Committed by Muslim Husband, Not Mother-in-Law.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court rejecting an anticipatory bail application filed by the appellant, the mother-in-law of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Registration Act Case — Compromise Decree Not Requiring Registration. Compromise decree relating to suit property does not require registration under Section 17(2)(vi) of Registration Act, 1908.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore Bench dated 13.02.2017, which dismissed the appellants' writ petition c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Allegations of fraud in counter-claim do not render it non-arbitrable unless serious and complex, under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed by Rekha Agarwal and Sunil Agarwal challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award Due to Limitation and Abandonment. Claims raised after 12 years from contract termination held barred by limitation under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 and deemed abandoned under contract terms.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award dated 19 July 2007 that had grante...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Naval Dockyard Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on extra work and escalation claims as plausible and not perverse under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arose from a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Categorization Under 1992 Guidelines for Premature Release of Life Convict in Murder During Robbery Case. Petitioner's Offence of Murder During Robbery Correctly Categorized Under Category 5(a) of the 1992 Guidelines, Which Superseded the 1978 Guidelines.

The petitioner, Harjeetsingh Niranjansingh Jabbal, was convicted under Sections 302 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code for murder committed during a rob...