Search Results for "encroachment regularization"

80 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows De-Sealing of Commercial Premises in PIL Based on Judicial Committee Order. Applicant's Premises Ordered to be De-Sealed Subject to Compliance with Common Order Dated 18.12.2023.

The present application (I.A. No.203615 of 2024) was filed by an individual applicant seeking de-sealing of his commercial premises located at plot No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus to Consider Representation for Regularization of Unauthorised Bunk Shop on Public Land. Petitioner's Illegal Encroachment on Public Land Precludes Issuance of Writ Direction Under Article 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner S. Balaji filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents (va...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Resort Developer Against Prohibition of Construction in Backwater Island. CRZ Notification 1991 Applies to Backwater Islands; No Development Zone Restrictions Upheld.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Kapico Kerala Resorts Pvt. Ltd. challenging a Kerala High Court order that prohibited resort construction on Ne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Demolition of Illegal Construction on Khajuria Lake and Restoration of Water Body. Municipal Corporation and State Directed to Recover Costs from Erring Officers and Initiate Prosecution for Unauthorized Filling of 100-Year-Old Lake.

The petitioner, an Indian citizen and resident of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to demolish illegal construction on CT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that IOD does not confer immunity from action for illegal construction beyond sanctioned plans under MRTP Act, 1966.

The appellant, Parvez M. Yusuf, filed a suit challenging a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai under Section 53(1) of the Mah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.

The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...