Search Results for "employee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "employee"

7023 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7023 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Writ Petition Challenging Termination, Allows Trust's Petition to Set Aside Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Employee's Appointment as Sweeper Was Illegal as It Violated the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and the Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Regulations, 1966, Which Require Prior Approval for Creation of Posts and Appointments.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves two writ petitions: one filed by Shatrughan Dada Kamble (the employee) challenging his termination, and another filed by the Aca...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petition in Labour Matter. Order Reserved on 24 April 2025.

24 Apr 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Workman Status in Industrial Dispute. Tribunal's finding that employee was a 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 upheld as not perverse.

5 Jul 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Procter and Gamble Health Limited (formerly Merck Ltd.), challenged an award dated 28.02.2020 passed by the Industrial Tribunal a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Writ Petition Challenging Termination for Unauthorized Absence and Misconduct. School Tribunal's order upheld as inquiry was fair and punishment proportionate under MEPS Act.

26 Aug 2022

The petitioner, Abdul Shakil Shakil Ahamad, was employed as a Peon in 1989 and later promoted to Junior Clerk. He alleged that he was paid a meager co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal's Order Reinstating Teacher in Minority Unaided School — Temporary Appointment Does Not Deprive Employee of Protection Under MEPS Act, 1977. The Court held that the termination of a temporary teacher without following the procedure under the MEPS Act and Rules is illegal, and the employee is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and 50% back wages.

8 Dec 2015

The petitioners, Maulana Azad Educational Trust and its school, challenged the judgment of the School Tribunal dated 08.07.2015 in Appeal No.21/2014. ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Validity of Domestic Enquiry for Fraudulent Cheque Book Issuance by Bank Employee. Court Considers Whether Principles of Natural Justice Were Followed in Disciplinary Proceedings Under Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002.

25 Jul 2006

The case concerns the disciplinary action taken by Bombay Mercantile Cooperative Bank Ltd. against its employee, Mohammed Saleem Shaikh. The Bank, a c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Vires of Daily Wage Employees Welfare Rules. Labour Union Seeks Declaration That Rules 4(3) and 4(4) of the Karnataka Daily Wage Employees Welfare Rules, 2013 Are Ultra Vires Sections 4(2) and 2(a) of the Karnataka Daily Wage Employees Welfare Act, 2012.

26 May 2021

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award to Injured Driver in Motor Accident Claim — Employer's Liability Affirmed Despite Insurance Policy Lapse. The Court held that the employer is liable to pay compensation under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 for injuries sustained by a driver in the course of employment, and the insurance company is not liable due to policy lapse.

15 Apr 2026

The present First Appeal was filed by The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. under Section 30 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, impugning the Judgme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Entire Rule 15 of MEPS Rules Applies to Probationary Employees Under Section 5(3) of MEPS Act — Non-Compliance of Sub-Rules (3) and (5) Does Not Ipso Facto Vitiate Termination if Sub-Rule (6) Is Satisfied. The court clarified that only sub-rule (6) of Rule 15 is relevant for termination during probation, and failure to comply with sub-rules (3) and (5) does not automatically invalidate termination if the Management has objectively assessed the employee's performance.

30 May 2023

This judgment arises from a reference made by a learned Single Judge to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, concerning the interpretati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Setting Aside Termination with Retrospective Effect. Termination of Employee with Retrospective Effect from Date of Medical Unfitness Held Illegal as It Deprives Employee of Opportunity to Be Heard.

7 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dated 22.08.2017 allowing Complaint ...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)