APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015
8 Mar 2016The judgment under consideration pertains to four appeals arising from a property dispute involving final plot no.267 of Town Planning Scheme IV, Mahi...
Search Results for "development plan rejection"
506 result(s) found
Found 506 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Admitted Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Appellate Court's Order in Redevelopment Dispute. Interim Relief Granted for Possession of Flats in Ready Building Despite Opposition from Some Members.
25 Jun 2010The writ petition was filed by a cooperative housing society ('Godi Kamgar Griha Sanstha Ltd.') and its developer ('Bharat Infrastructure & Engineerin...
- 104
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned construction; Court held that retention of premium without utilization is unjust enrichment and directed refund with interest.
1 Jan 2026The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Restrains MMRDA from Taking Coercive Actions in Writ Petition Challenging Penalty Demand for Construction Delay; Lease Deed Clauses on Time Limit and Additional Built-Up Area Interpreted
20 Nov 2019The petitioners, Raghuleela Builders Private Limited and Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging t...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 47 of 2013 Regarding Change of Land Use and Allotment. The court examined the validity of modifying user of a plot from public utility to commercial and the subsequent allotment to a trust.
7 Sep 2016This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Citizen Forum For Equality, a registered NGO, challenging the modification of user of a plot in the...
- 55
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Public Parking Lot and FSI Computation in Mumbai Building Project. The Court held that construction of public parking lot above plinth level without valid commencement certificate was illegal, and remanded FSI computation issues for fresh consideration.
24 Oct 2019The case involves a dispute over the construction of a residential building and a public parking lot (PPL) by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. (SRU...
- 234
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Legality of NMMC Resolution Reserving Lands Vested in CIDCO in Draft Development Plan. The case concerns whether Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation can reserve plots vested with City and Industrial Development Corporation under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, despite CIDCO's authority to develop and auction such lands.
30 Aug 2022This public interest litigation comprised two petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, raising common issues of fact and law concernin...
- 16
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Petitioners Challenging Modifications to Development Control Regulations for Greater Bombay, 1991 Under Section 37 of MRTP Act. Petitioners Allege Amendments Are Not Minor, Ultra Vires, and Violate Right to Clean Environment Under Article 21.
21 Nov 2006Seven petitioners, all tax payers and rate-payers of the State of Maharashtra and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, filed a writ petition u...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging LOI and Final Approval for New Colleges — Petitioner Lacks Locus Due to De-affiliation. The court held that a de-affiliated institution cannot challenge permissions granted to other colleges under the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016.
26 Aug 2024The petitioner, Nisargdeep Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, a registered public trust, had been running Shri Tuljabhavani Arts and Science College at Chitte-...
- 280
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Development Charges Demand on Nazul Land for TDR-Based Construction — No Legal Basis for Levy Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code or Nagpur Land Rules. The court held that the Nazul Tahsildar cannot demand development charges for NOC to sell flats constructed using TDR on nazul land as there is no statutory provision authorizing such levy.
1 Feb 2023The petitioner, Sunil Thapar, owner of nazul Plot No.94 in Ramdaspeth, Nagpur, entered into a development agreement with M/s Raghav Life Spaces on 22 ...
- 84
