APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995
16 Dec 2005The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...
Search Results for "counter-claims"
119 result(s) found
Found 119 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Software Distribution Dispute — Pre-Arbitration Amicable Resolution Clause Held Directory. Clause 17 of the Software Distribution Agreement dated 2nd April 2011 provides for arbitration; court appoints sole arbitrator despite non-compliance with 30-day discussion period.
5 Jun 2020The petitioner, Quick Heal Technologies Limited, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seek...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ONGC Against Upholding of Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Interpretation of Contract Terms and Findings of Fact by Arbitral Tribunal Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Apr 2026The case arises from a commercial arbitration appeal filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) against the judgment of a Single Judge of th...
- 165
High Court
KAHC010131542020_1
22 Apr 2024The matter arose from two writ petitions filed by M/s. Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Corporation Limited, a Government company engaged in electric...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Matter, Restores Arbitral Award. Court holds that Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, does not permit reappreciation of evidence or substitution of the arbitrator's view, and the Single Judge exceeded jurisdiction by setting aside the award on merits.
14 Jun 2016The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a judgment dated 29th July 2015, whereby the learn...
- 130
High Court
Bombay High Court Pronounces Verdict in Arbitration Petition Challenging Award That Set Aside Termination of Oil Terminal Operations Contract. Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Alleges Award is Patently Illegal as Arbitrator Disregarded Contract Terms and Misinterpreted Safety Audit Report.
19 Dec 2025The dispute arose from an Operating and Services Agreement (OSA) dated 5 May 2015 between HPCL and Aegis for management, operation and maintenance of ...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatories. The court held that a non-signatory can be bound by an arbitration agreement if there is a direct relationship with the signatory and the transaction, and that enforcement cannot be refused on grounds of public policy unless the award is contrary to the fundamental policy of Indian law.
18 Apr 2016The applicant, Integrated Sales Services Limited, a Hong Kong company, obtained a foreign arbitral award dated 28 March 2010 from an International Arb...
- 70
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Commercial Contract Dispute — Joint and Several Liability of Holding Company and Subsidiary Upheld. Division Bench's restoration of award under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 affirmed, rejecting challenge on grounds of patent illegality and public policy.
3 Sep 2024The case arises from a dispute between OPG Power Generation Private Limited (OPG) and its holding company Gita Power and Infrastructure Private Limite...
- 690
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Property Dispute Over Lease Deeds and Gift Deeds — Upholds Validity of Irrevocable License and Gift Deeds. The Court held that the High Court erred in granting interim relief without considering the balance of convenience and prima facie case, and that the documents in question were not vitiated by fraud or misrepresentation.
1 Jan 2026The present appeals arise from a common judgment of the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dated 26.09.2022, which affirmed the orders of the S...
- 102
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Liquidated Damages for Delay in Construction Contract. The Court Affirmed the Division Bench's Restoration of the Arbitral Award, Holding that Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited and the Award Was Valid Under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
28 Apr 2025The appeal arose from a construction contract dispute between Software Technology Parks of India (respondent) and M/s Consolidated Construction Consor...
- 445
