Search Results for "consignee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "consignee"

145 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

High Court

Divison Bench of Bombay High Court Reserved Judgment in Admiralty Appeal on Quantum of Security for Release of Arrested Vessel M.V. Nordlake; Order of Single Judge Requiring Full-Claim Security Challenged. The appellant foreign ship-owner contended that under the International Convention on Arrest of Ships, 1999 and Rule 954 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, security should be limited to the vessel's value of Rs.47 crores, while the respondent Union of India argued that security must cover the full claim of Rs.1058 crores.

7 Mar 2012

The appeal arose from collision between the first defendant vessel, M.V. Nordlake, and the naval vessel INS Vindhyagiri near Mumbai on 30 January 2011...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows ONGC's Appeal and Dismisses Soconord's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Oil Well Casing Pipes — Umpire's Award Upheld as Not Liable to Be Set Aside Under Section 30 of Arbitration Act, 1940. Court Held That the Learned Single Judge Erred in Setting Aside the Award on Grounds of Non-Consideration of Certain Aspects, as the Umpire Had Considered All Relevant Material and the Award Was Not Vitiated by Any Error of Law Apparent on the Face of the Record.

24 Jul 2014

The case involves cross-appeals arising from an arbitration dispute between Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) and M/s. Soconord OCTG, SA (S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Order Upheld. Penalty under Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 set aside for lack of evidence of aiding and abetting.

21 Sep 2010

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai, against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India in Railways Act Case — Demand Notices After Delivery Valid for Misdeclaration Under Section 66. Penal Charges for False Description of Goods Can Be Imposed at Any Stage, and the High Court Erred in Applying Provisions for Overloading to a Misdeclaration Case Under Section 66 of Railways Act, 1989.

5 Jun 2025

The dispute arose when the Indian Railways raised demand notices against several consignors for misdeclaration of goods carriage. The respondents paid...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in KVAT Penalty Case — Assessee's Goods in Transit Not Liable to Penalty Under Section 53(7) of KVAT Act, 2003. Goods Intercepted While Moving from Pune to Bangalore with Valid Invoice; Penalty Set Aside as No Contravention of Act Established.

5 Feb 2018

The appellant, M/s Jai Hind Ply, a proprietorship concern engaged in the sale of plywood, timber, and related materials, is registered under the Mahar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Against Port Trust as Barred by Limitation Under Section 120 of Major Port Trust Act, 1963. Suit filed beyond six months from accrual of cause of action is not maintainable.

4 Feb 2015

The plaintiff, American President Lines Ltd. and others, filed a suit against the Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay (BPT) and Nahar Industrial E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Supplier Against Western Coalfields Limited for Withholding Admitted Dues. Withholding of Payment Based on Vigilance Report Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice.

31 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Sujyoti India (P) Limited, a private limited company and authorized distributor of SKF India Limited, entered into a rate contract wit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention of Goods Under GST for Lack of Jurisdiction — Second Detention Without Proper Authorization Invalid. The court held that detention of goods under Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017 requires proper authorization and cannot be done without jurisdiction.

19 Aug 2020

The petitioner, a transporter registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Railway Claims Case — Claim for Non-Delivery of Onions Held Time-Barred Under Section 78B of Railways Act, 1890. Notice of Claim Given After Six Months from Date When Delivery Ought to Have Taken Place, Hence Claim Not Maintainable.

11 Feb 2010

The appellant, Union of India, represented by the General Managers of Central and Northern Railways, appealed against the judgment and decree of the R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Non-Delivery Case — Notice Under Section 106 of Railways Act, 1989 Must Be Liberally Constructed. The court held that the notice dated 25-01-1993 was valid and the claim was not barred by limitation, as the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to the Railway Claims Tribunal.

11 Oct 2013

The appellant, M/s. Sapna Emporium, filed a first appeal against the judgment and order dated 22-09-1995 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bombay...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)