Search Results for "concurrent conviction"

708 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 708 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals by Accused Against Conviction for Murder of IOC Officer — Admissibility of Confessional Statements Under Section 25 of Evidence Act Challenged. Confessional Statements Made to Non-Investigating Police Officers Argued as Inadmissible Under Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

These appeals arose from the conviction of several accused for the murder of S. Manjunath, a Sales Officer with Indian Oil Corporation, who had inspec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Customs Act Case — Evidence of Possession of Contraband Gold Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 135(1)(a)(i) and 135(1)(b)(i) of Customs Act, 1962 and Section 5 of Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947.

The applicant, Eliyad Abdulla Bholim, was tried for offences punishable under Sections 135(1)(a)(i) and 135(1)(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 and Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Passport Fraud Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Principle of Parity. Conviction under Section 420 IPC and Passports Act set aside as co-accused with similar role were acquitted and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, accused No.2, was convicted under Section 420 IPC read with Section 12(2) of the Passports Act, 1967 for allegedly facilitating the iss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Assault and Criminal Intimidation but Grants Probation to Accused. Court holds that benefit of Probation of Offenders Act can be granted even after conviction if no previous conviction is proved and circumstances warrant leniency.

The case arises from a private complaint filed by Sushil Sawant (appellant) against six accused persons (respondents 2 to 7) alleging offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Evidence Identifying Driver. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act Quashed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Applicant Was Driving the Offending Tempo.

The applicant, Ramnath Yashwant Gholap, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Ashti, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eye-Witness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sandeep, was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Abdul Hameed on 30.10.1997. The prosecution alleged...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused No.3 in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Benefit of Doubt — Conviction Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petition was filed by accused No.3, Krishna Veni, challenging her conviction under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Death by Negligence — Confirms Concurrent Findings of Guilt Under Sections 279 and 304A IPC.

The revision petitioner, Kishor N, was convicted by the Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court IV, Bengaluru, in C.C.No.7848/2018 dated 30.04.2022 for ...