Search Results for "compensation cap"

137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 984 of 2018

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Arbitration Petition Challenging Award in Advertising Rights Tender Dispute. Court Examines Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The arbitration petition arose from a tender floated by Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) on 9 November 2018 for allotment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Complainant not required to prove service obtained for self-employment livelihood unless appellant proves commercial purpose.

Consumer Protection - Maintainability of Complaint - Definition of Consumer - Service obtained for Commercial Purpose - Onus of Proof - Burden of Proo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Laundry Contract. Petition Questions Recovery Rate for Lost Linen, Delay Penalty, Penalty Cap, and Fixed Cost Compensation Under the Arbitration Act, 1996.

The Central Railway filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 7 March 2024 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Determines Reference on Maintainability of Section 18 Reference Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After 2013 Act Came into Force. Key Issue Involves Whether Landowners Can Seek Enhancement Under Old Act When Award Passed After Commencement of 2013 Act.

Background: The matter arose from a land acquisition proceeding initiated by the Pune Municipal Corporation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. A no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Overrules Res Judicata Objection in Admiralty Limitation Suit; Prior Withdrawal of Application Before Chinese Court Does Not Bar Fresh Suit Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute arose from a voyage of the vessel M.V. YURIY ARSHENEVSKIY, owned by Murmansk Shipping Company, a Russian entity, which was chartered to ca...