Search Results for "common directors"

798 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 798 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Franchise Dispute: Breach of Contract Not Cheating Without Fraudulent Intent. Essential Ingredients of Sections 420 and 406 IPC Not Made Out as Dispute is Purely Civil in Nature.

The applicants, directors of AN Retail Ventures Private Limited (ANR), sought quashing of FIR No.134/2021 registered at Osmanpura Police Station, Aura...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Tender by Western Coalfields Limited. Tender cancellation upheld as employer has discretion to cancel tender before issuance of purchase order, and no concluded contract exists.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by successful bidders challenging the cancellation of a global tender issued by Western Coalfields Limi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Criminal proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot be initiated against directors without specific averments of their role in the company's affairs.

The case involves two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) challenging a common order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Revokes Leave for Representative Suit in Tata Group Shareholder Dispute. Court holds that shareholders of different listed companies lack the same interest required under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC.

The Plaintiffs, claiming to be shareholders of various listed companies of the Tata Group, filed a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 of the Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for FEMA Violations in Bogus Export Case — Appellant Director Held Liable for Receiving Remittances Without Actual Exports Under Sections 3(b) and 3(d) of FEMA.

The case involves an appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreig...