Search Results for "bribe"

749 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 749 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Public Servant in Corruption Case for Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Appellant convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting Rs. 500 as illegal gratification for processing a grant application.

The appellant, Manoj Shankar Deshpande, a public servant working as an Assistant in the Fisheries Department, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Acquits High Court Chobdar in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conviction Reversed Due to Unreliable Complainant Evidence and Lack of Proper Verification of Bribe Demand.

The appeal arose from a conviction of Shridhar Chavan, a Chobdar (attendant) in the High Court of Bombay, under sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Contends Non-Proof of Bribe Demand and Admission of Loan Repayment by Complainant.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 29.03.2005 in Special Case No.26/2003 passed by the Special Judge at Aurangabad, convicting the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajendra Suryakant Kapile, was a Senior Clerk in the Sub-Regional Provident Fund Office, CIDCO, Aurangabad. The complainant, Dharamchan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Allegation of Bribe Demand Fails as Complainant's Testimony Lacks Corroboration and Material Witnesses Not Examined Under Section 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sayaji Dashrath Kawade, was serving as Sub-Divisional Engineer in the Department of Telecommunications at Aurangabad. The complainant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Conviction of Sub-Engineer in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe for Electric Connection Proved Through Trap and Recovery of Tainted Currency Notes.

The appellant, Anil Krishnarao Apashingkar, was a Sub-Engineer with M.S.E.D.C.L. The complainant, Jagannath Rajaram Mane, applied for an electric conn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction in Bribery Case. Appeal Challenges Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act for Accepting ₹1,000 Bribe for Caste Verification Certificate.

The case arose from a complaint filed by Kiran Kumar, a temporary driver with BMTC, who alleged that T. Siddaiah, a First Division Assistant in the Ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence on Demand and Acceptance. The Trial Court’s Acquittal Under Prevention of Corruption Act Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Recovery of Bribe Money Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The present appeal arose from the acquittal of the respondent, a Talathi (Class III government servant), by the Special Judge for offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Revenue Inspector and Middleman Challenged Trial Court's Conviction for Demanding and Accepting Bribe for Change of Khata, Alleging Invalid Sanction and Procedural Errors.

The criminal appeal arose from the judgment of conviction and sentence by the Special Court in Spl. Case No.679/2011 dated 13.06.2013, convicting the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Proceedings and Contradictory Witness Testimony. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 8 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sri. Manjanna M.K., a Head Constable at Bagalagunte Police Station, was convicted by the XXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge...