Search Results for "balance of convenience"

587 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 587 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Possession Dispute. Court Held That Findings of Fact by Trial Court on Prima Facie Case and Possession Cannot Be Interfered With Under Article 227 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Shivaram Narayan Gatkul and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Suit from Kolhapur to Bombay Due to Applicant's Ill Health and Respondent's Alternate Address. Transfer Granted Under Section 24(1)(b)(i) CPC as Balance of Convenience Favored Applicant, Who Was 76 and Suffering from Diabetes, While Respondent Had a Mumbai Address.

The applicant, Shri Ganpat D. Kulthe, aged 76 and a retired individual suffering from diabetes, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice Under M.R.T.P. Act — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction as Structure Appears Temporary and Unauthorized.

The appellant, Mohd. Ismail Gulam Shaikh, filed an appeal against an order of the trial court refusing ad-interim relief in a suit seeking injunction ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Lease Dispute — Plaintiff Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction as Lease Expired and Possession Was Not Proven.

The petitioner, M/s. Meher Farms Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Adhoc District Judge-1 (FTC) North Goa, Panaji, dated 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Order Refusing Interim Relief in Share Pledge Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Refusal to Grant Interim Relief Was Perverse and Contrary to Law, Directing Status Quo on Pledged Shares.

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arose from an order of the arbitral tribunal refusing to grant interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Orders in Labour Dispute — Upholds Interim Relief Granted to Union Under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court Has Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief Without First Deciding Maintainability of Complaint.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by industrial companies (M/s Saklecha Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd., M/s Sudesh Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd., M...