Search Results for "award quashing"

915 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 915 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 2973 OF 2025

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Award Under National Highways Act, 1956 — Compensation Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Determination of Compensation Without Notice and Hearing Held Invalid Under Section 3G(2) of the National Highways Act, 1956.

The petitioners, owners of shops and properties in Solapur, challenged the award of compensation dated 31st December 2021 passed by the Competent Auth...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Correction of Land Acquisition Award to Reflect Petitioners as Owners Based on Civil Court Decree. The court held that revenue authorities are bound to give effect to a civil court decree declaring ownership and must correct the award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, Vishwanath and Chandrasen, sons of Girmaji Gonde, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Developer Not a 'Person Interested' Under Section 3(b) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as Its Interest Arose After Acquisition Through Agreement with Acquiring Authority.

The dispute arose from land acquisition by the Burdwan Development Authority (BDA) for a satellite township in Burdwan, West Bengal, under the Land Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Lapsed as Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Despite Award Made in 2008.

The petitioners, Reliance Natural Resources Limited and its director Murli Manohar Purohit, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...