KAHC010102062008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "arbitrary discretionary power"
760 result(s) found
Found 760 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Upholds Housing Board Allotment Regulations Amendment — Classification Based on Income and Location Not Arbitrary. Challenge to Reservation Categories A and C under Regulation 4 and 9A of Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations, 1983 fails as reasonable classification under Article 14.
18 Oct 2019The petitioner, Bhojappa K, an advocate, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the constitutional...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Body Building Eligible for 5% Sports Quota Reservation; Quashes Restrictive Government Resolution (2026)
13 Mar 2026The petitioner, a university-level Body Building Sportperson, challenged the Government Resolution dated 01/07/2016 which restricted the benefit of 5%...
- 960
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Interim Order in Criminal Proceedings Due to Lack of Reasons and Improper Exercise of Inherent Powers. The Court Held That Blanket 'No Coercive Measures' Orders Without Conditions and Reasons Are Impermissible Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Article 226 of the Constitution, as They Hamper Investigation and Bypass Anticipatory Bail Provisions.
13 Apr 2021The dispute arose from an interim order dated 28.09.2020 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in a writ petition fil...
- 526
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Challenging CIDCO Plot Allotments — Allegations of Fictitious Societies Grabbing Plots at Fixed Rates. The validity of allocations under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and CIDCO Regulations depends on the genuineness of the housing societies.
23 Nov 2005The Public Interest Litigation was instituted by Public Concern for Governance Trust, a registered charitable trust, against the State of Maharashtra,...
- 42
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO.323 OF 2000
18 Oct 2005Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various companies, including Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and India...
- 12
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.
7 Feb 2025The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...
- 813
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tender Condition in Housekeeping Contracts. Court holds that condition requiring prior hospital experience for housekeeping work is arbitrary and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
29 Jun 2018The case involves two writ petitions filed by Mahalsa Services and Cam Industrial Services challenging a tender condition imposed by the State of Goa ...
- 141
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Cancellation of Highest Bid in Tender for Plot Lease Due to Arbitrariness and Non-Application of Mind. State Instrumentality's Decision Must Be Based on Relevant Considerations and Not Inconsistent Stands.
23 Jul 2024The Bombay High Court, in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, examined the challenge by a petitioner-firm against the deci...
- 617
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Electricity Duty Exemption Case: Promissory Estoppel Not Applicable Due to Lack of Clear Representation and Public Interest. The court held that the Industrial Policy 2012 did not create an enforceable right to retrospective exemption, and the notification under Section 9 of the Bihar Electricity Duty Act, 1948 was validly made prospective.
1 Dec 2020The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Jharkhand against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court, which had directed the State to...
- 163
