Search Results for "analyst report"

190 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 190 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Restores Conviction in Food Adulteration Case for Excessive Tartrazine Yellow in Mohanthal. Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Lack of Cogent Reasons Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Gujarat filed a criminal revision application challenging the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Himmatnagar, dated 05/02/2013, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Mens Rea and Active Participation. Joint Suicide Pact Does Not Amount to Abetment Under Section 306 IPC.

The case pertains to the death of actress Ms. Pratyusha, who consumed poison along with the appellant, Gudipalli Siddhartha Reddy, on 23rd February 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Adulterated Milk in Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Case — Marginal Deficiency in Milk Solids Non-Fat Not Excusable. The Court held that prescribed standards under the Act must be strictly followed and even marginal deviation constitutes adulteration.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Raj Kumar, who was convicted under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated mil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Failure to Supply Public Analyst Report to Accused Deprived Him of Valuable Right to Get Sample Tested by Central Food Laboratory.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, filed an appeal against the acquittal of the respondents (accused) by the Judicial Magistrate, F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Failure to Follow Mandatory Search Procedure and Reliance on Interested Witnesses Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Chandpasha, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Yadgiri, in Special Case No.1/2011 for offences under Sections 8 and 20 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42 of NDPS Act. Secret Information Not Reduced to Writing and Sent to Superior Officer, Rendering Search and Seizure Illegal.

The appellant, Shaikh Ibrahim Shaikh Usman, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon in Sessions Case (NDPS) No.11 of 2004 for an offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Mixing and Sampling from Bulk Container Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused Suryabhan Ukarda Rokade for offences under the Prevention of Food Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

The appellant, Rambahadur Bhimsingh Vishwakarma, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, on 17th July 2002 for the murder of o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Unexplained Delay in Sending Sample. Delay of 61 days in sending sample to Public Analyst under Rule 7(3) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, entitles accused to benefit of doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 6/3/1992 passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 46th Co...