Search Results for "alternate accommodation"

340 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 340 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Medically Invalidated CRPF Constable in Service Law Case — Employer Must Consider Alternative Employment Before Medical Invalidation. Medical Invalidation Without Exploring Alternative Post Violates Right to Livelihood Under Article 21 of Constitution.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India and CRPF officers against the High Court of Himachal Pradesh's order reinstating a constable (driver...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Letter of Intent for Cluster Redevelopment Under DCR 33(9) — No Violation of Tenant Rights Found. Petitioner's claim of illegalities in documents and failure to execute permanent alternate accommodation agreements rejected as premature and lacking merit.

The petitioner, Mr Murtuza Shabbir Tinwala, a resident and tenant in the Bhendi Bazaar Area, filed a Writ Petition challenging the Letter of Intent (L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Disconnection of Water Supply Without Individual Notice Under Section 354 of MMC Act, 1888. Municipal Corporation Directed to Restore Water Supply Within 48 Hours as Disconnection Without Notice to Occupant Is Not Permissible.

The appellant, Balkrishna Dwivedi, filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai dated 28.10.2013 refusing to grant ad-interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition for Possession Against Tenant in Arbitration Dispute — Interim Relief Denied as Disputed Questions of Fact Require Trial

The petitioner, M/s. Gandhi Adhivitiya Combine, a developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Occupants Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Majority Consent and Sanctioned Plans Upheld. Court held that the redevelopment scheme was validly sanctioned and the petitioners' objections were not sufficient to stall the project.

The petitioners, seventeen occupants of residential tenements in Dalal Estate, Mumbai Central, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...