Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Disconnection of Water Supply Without Individual Notice Under Section 354 of MMC Act, 1888. Municipal Corporation Directed to Restore Water Supply Within 48 Hours as Disconnection Without Notice to Occupant Is Not Permissible.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 133
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Balkrishna Dwivedi, filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai dated 28.10.2013 refusing to grant ad-interim relief. The appellant sought reconnection of water supply and prevention of disconnection of electricity supply to his flat. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai had disconnected water supply to the building based on a report that the building's life would not exceed 10 years even after repairs. The appellant contended that no individual notice under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 was issued to him, and his right to alternate accommodation was being overlooked. The developer, though made a party, did not appear. The court observed that the disconnection of water supply without individual notice is not contemplated under Section 354 of the MMC Act or any circular. The court also noted that the issue of alternate accommodation is not settled and the appellant's rights cannot be overlooked. The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the trial court's order and directing the Municipal Corporation to restore water supply within 48 hours, subject to the appellant depositing arrears if any. The court also directed the trial court to decide the notice of motion expeditiously.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Section 354 of MMC Act, 1888 - Notice Requirement - Disconnection of water supply without individual notice to occupant is not contemplated under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - The court held that the Corporation's action of disconnecting water supply without issuing individual notice to the appellant/flat owner is not permissible under the Act or any circular (Paras 3-4).

B) Property Law - Right to Alternate Accommodation - Demolition - The right of the appellant/plaintiff to alternate accommodation cannot be overlooked before demolishing the building at the instance of the developer or society - The court noted that the issue of alternate accommodation is not yet settled and the developer is not coming forward to execute the agreement (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Municipal Corporation can disconnect water supply to a building without issuing individual notice under Section 354 of the MMC Act, 1888 to the occupant, and whether the appellant's right to alternate accommodation can be overlooked before demolition.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The order dated 28.10.2013 passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Mumbai is set aside. The Municipal Corporation is directed to restore water supply within 48 hours from the date of the order, subject to the appellant depositing arrears if any. The trial court is directed to decide the notice of motion expeditiously.

Law Points

  • Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act
  • 1888 requires individual notice to occupant before demolition
  • disconnection of water supply without notice is not contemplated
  • right to alternate accommodation must be considered before demolition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (12) 71

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1233 OF 2013

2013-12-24

Anoop V. Mohta, J.

Mr. Pawan K. Pandey i/by M/s. Clayderman & Co. for the Appellant, Mr. S. K. Sonawane for the Respondent/Corporation

Shri Balkrishna Dwivedi

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal from order refusing ad-interim relief in a suit for reconnection of water supply and injunction against disconnection of electricity.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought reconnection of water supply and prevention of disconnection of electricity supply to his flat.

Filing Reason

Municipal Corporation disconnected water supply to the building without issuing individual notice under Section 354 of MMC Act, 1888, and the appellant's right to alternate accommodation was not settled.

Previous Decisions

The learned Judge, City Civil Court, Mumbai on 28.10.2013 refused to grant ad-interim relief.

Issues

Whether the Municipal Corporation can disconnect water supply without issuing individual notice under Section 354 of MMC Act, 1888? Whether the appellant's right to alternate accommodation can be overlooked before demolition?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that no individual notice under Section 354 of MMC Act was issued to him and his right to alternate accommodation is not settled. Respondent/Corporation did not file a reply.

Ratio Decidendi

Disconnection of water supply without individual notice to the occupant is not contemplated under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 or any circular. The right of the occupant to alternate accommodation must be considered before demolition.

Judgment Excerpts

The disconnection of water supply of the building, in such fashion, in my view, is not contemplated action under Section 354 of MMC Act and/or any circular even if issued by the Corporation. The person/occupant/owner of the flat are entitled for the basic amenities like water and electricity.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai seeking reconnection of water supply and injunction against disconnection of electricity. The trial court refused ad-interim relief on 28.10.2013. The appellant then filed the present appeal before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888: Section 354
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Requirement of Second Forest Transit Pass for Iron Ore Transport from Railway Sliding to Factory Premises. The court held that such insistence was contrary to law laid down in W.P.No.24072/2005 and...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Disconnection of Water Supply Without Individual Notice Under Section 354 of MMC Act, 1888. Municipal Corporation Directed to Restore Water Supply Within 48 Hours as Disconnection Without Notice to Occupant Is ...