Search Results for "Waqf Act, 1995"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Eviction Suit — Landlord's Title Not Required to Be Proved in Eviction Proceedings Under Section 13(1)(e) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenant's Challenge to Landlord's Title Not Maintainable Without Attornment.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original plaintiffs (landlords) against the judgment and decree dated 30-09-2013 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944. Petitioner entitled to interest at 6% per annum from the date immediately after expiry of three months from receipt of refund application till date of refund.

The petitioner, M & G Global Services Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in providing Information Technology enabled services to its group entities located outside...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application in Defamation Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction Without Clause 12 Leave. Section 19 CPC Requires Defamation Suit to Be Filed Where Defamation Occurred, Not Where Reputation Is Harmed.

The plaintiff, Sameer Gulamnabi Kazi, Chairman of Maharashtra State Board of Waqf, filed a defamation suit against defendants alleging defamatory vide...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Dispute — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation. Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application Fails as Court Must Look Only at Plaint Averments and Not Evidence.

The applicant, Mr. Nilesh Sangodkar, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, challenging the order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of IA for Framing Additional Issues in Injunction Suit. Order 14 Rule 1 and 5 CPC does not mandate framing of issues on every factual controversy; only on material propositions of fact or law.

The petitioner, plaintiff in O.S. No.374/2016, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondents to restrain them from interfering with hi...