Search Results for "Urban Local Bodies Act"

240 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 240 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses SEZ Developer's Petition for Octroi Exemption and Refund. State SEZ Policy Exemption Not Enforceable Against Municipal Corporation Without Statutory Amendment.

The petitioner, EON Kharadi Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) developer, sought exemption from octroi and refund of octroi paid ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Restrains Municipality from Locking and Sealing Premises for Property Tax Arrears of Owner. Tenant Cannot Be Compelled to Pay Owner's Tax Liability; No Statutory Power to Lock and Seal Under Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998.

The petitioner, V. Saminathan, filed a writ petition before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus to restrain the firs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Encroachment Removal Notice as Re-litigation. Petitioner failed to establish legal right over public street; court directed eviction within four weeks under Section 128 of Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998.

The present writ petition was filed by M.Annamalai challenging a final notice dated 19.09.2025 issued under Section 128(1)(b)(2) of the Tamil Nadu Urb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Lessor in Rent Control Exclusion Case. Company That Lost Rent Control Protection Due to High Paid-Up Share Capital Cannot Regain It by Subsequent Reduction.

The case involves a dispute between M/s. Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Lessor) and M/s. Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. (Defendant/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Water Tax Levy Under UP Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Reverses Refund Order. Water and Sewerage Tax Imposed on Premises is Valid as Tax on Lands and Buildings Under Entry 49 of List II, Not a Fee, Under Section 52(1)(a) of the Act.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the first respondent, Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation, challenging the levy of water ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act, 2006 as Constitutionally Valid. Levy of fire prevention fee under Section 12 is a fee, not a tax, and the Act is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and a citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Mahar...