Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representations Before Eviction in Encroachment Cases Under Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act. Show Cause Notice Under Section 128(1)(b)(2) of Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 Challenged; Court Holds Authority Must Consider Explanations Before Final Order.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, P. Vijaya and E. Lakshmi, filed two writ petitions challenging show cause notices dated 13.02.2026 issued by the Commissioner of Thirukovilur Municipality under Section 128(1)(b)(2) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998. The notices alleged that the petitioners had encroached upon a water body and called upon them to show cause why their structures should not be removed. The petitioners submitted their explanations on 25.02.2026. Their grievance was that before taking a final decision on their representations, the respondents were attempting to evict them and demolish their residential house and flower shop without due process of law. The court observed that the statute mandates that any representation received within the prescribed time limit must be considered by the authority before passing final orders. The court held that the competent authority must pass final orders after considering the representations before initiating any enforcement action for removal of encroachments. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' representations and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks. Until final orders are passed, the respondents were directed not to evict the petitioners or demolish their structures. The writ petitions were disposed of with these directions.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Encroachment - Show Cause Notice - Section 128 Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 - Petitioners challenged show cause notices issued under Section 128(1)(b)(2) alleging encroachment on a water body - Court held that the authority must consider the representations submitted by the petitioners before passing final orders and cannot initiate enforcement action without following statutory procedure (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the authority can proceed with eviction without considering the petitioners' explanations submitted in response to show cause notices under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioners' representations dated 25.02.2026 and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks. Until final orders are passed, the respondents are directed not to evict the petitioners or demolish their structures.

Law Points

  • Statutory procedure must be followed before eviction
  • Representation must be considered before final order
  • Section 128 Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act 1998
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (03) 30

W.P. Nos. 11550 and 11554 of 2026

2026-03-26

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender

Ms. Sasi.V for petitioners, Mr.D.Ravichander for R1, Dr.T.Seenivasan for R2

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging show cause notices issued under Section 128(1)(b)(2) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998, alleging encroachment on a water body.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of show cause notices and direction to forbear respondents from evicting petitioners or demolishing their structures without due process of law.

Filing Reason

Petitioners received show cause notices alleging encroachment on a water body and feared eviction before their explanations were considered.

Issues

Whether the authority can proceed with eviction without considering the petitioners' explanations submitted in response to show cause notices under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners submitted that the impugned notice reveals the alleged encroachment is within a water body and that the authority is attempting to evict them without considering their explanations. Respondents argued that the procedures under Section 128 must be followed.

Ratio Decidendi

The statute mandates that any representation received within the prescribed time limit shall be considered by the authority before passing final orders. The competent authority must pass final orders before initiating any enforcement action for removal of encroachments.

Judgment Excerpts

The statute mandates that any representation received within the prescribed time limit shall be considered by the authority or the officer concerned before passing final orders. Thus, the competent authority has to pass the final orders before initiating any enforcement action for the removal of encroachments.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998: 128, 128(1)(b)(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representations Before Eviction in Encroachment Cases Under Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act. Show Cause Notice Under Section 128(1)(b)(2) of Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 Challenged; Court Holds ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in KSRTC Conductor Dismissal Case — Sets Aside Single Judge Order and Directs Settlement of Benefits. Legal Representatives of Deceased Workman Entitled to Back Wages and Other Benefits from Date of Dismis...