Search Results for "Trade Well"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Trade Well"

3253 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3253 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Petitioner's Trade Mark for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirement Under Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Removal of Trade Mark 'CIPLA' Held Void as Registrar Failed to Send O-3 Notice to Registered Proprietor, Contravening Statutory Mandate.

23 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Cipla Limited, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the removal of its registered trade mark 'CIPLA' from the register and a mandamus ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — 'SUPER MOR CHHAP' Held Deceptively Similar to 'MOR CHHAP'. Registration and Prior Use of 'MOR CHHAP' for Lime Plaster Entitled Plaintiff to Protection Under Trade and Merchandise Act, 1958.

30 Sep 2016

The plaintiff, Sunil Manikchand Kasliwal, filed a suit for trade mark infringement against the defendant, Rahul Uttam Suryavanshi, alleging that the d...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging IPAB's Dismissal of Trade Mark Rectification Under Trade Marks Act, 1999. The Court Examines the Interplay Between Common Law Rights and Registered Trade Marks, Specifically Sections 27(2), 28, 47, and 57, in Context of Deceptive Similarity Between 'ROFOL' and 'PROFOL'.

3 Apr 2012

The dispute between Medical Technologies Limited (petitioner) and Neon Laboratories Limited (respondent no.1) concerned the trade marks 'PROFOL' and '...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Trial Court's Discretion Not Found Arbitrary or Perverse in Restraining Use of Deceptively Similar Mark 'Shriphal'.

9 Oct 2020

The appeal arises from an order of the trial court granting a temporary injunction in favor of the respondent/plaintiff, M/s Mysore Deep Perfumery Hou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Use of 'KATARIA INSURANCE' Held Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Marks 'KATARIA' and 'KATARIA INSURANCE CONSULTANCY' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

8 Dec 2025

The plaintiff, Bhavesh Suresh Kataria, proprietor of Kataria Jewellery Insurance Consultancy, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction Application in Passing Off Action Over Mark 'Indiacom' vs 'Indicom'. Court Holds That Plaintiff Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case of Passing Off or Deceptive Similarity Between 'Indiacom' and 'Indicom', and Balance of Convenience Favoured Defendant.

28 Oct 2005

The dispute arose from a passing off action filed by Indiacom Limited (plaintiff) seeking to restrain Tata Teleservices Ltd. and others (defendants) f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Stockbroker Liable for Unauthorized Trades by Agent. Broker Failed to Prove Client Authorization for Disputed Trades, Resulting in Compensation of Rs.14,37,200/- to Client.

21 Apr 2026

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly IIFL Secu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trade Name Dispute Over 'Bhagat Tarachand' — Plaintiff Establishes Prima Facie Case of Proprietorship and Likelihood of Confusion. The court restrained defendants from using the trade name 'Bhagat Tarachand' or any deceptively similar name in their restaurant business at Inorbit Mall, Vashi, pending suit.

25 Aug 2010

The plaintiff, Vanita Dilip Chawla, filed a suit seeking a declaration that she is the registered proprietor of the trade name 'Bhagat Tarachand' and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case Involving Beer Brands 'Haywards 5000' and '50000'. The court held that the numeral '5000' is an essential feature of the plaintiff's mark and that the defendants' mark '50000' is deceptively similar, leading to likelihood of confusion.

31 Mar 2012

The plaintiff, Skol Breweries Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, Fortune Alcobrew Pvt. Limited and Hindust...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'HAYWARDS 5000' v. 'COX 5000'. The court held that the Plaintiff's registered trademarks 'HAYWARDS 5000' and 'FIVE THOUSAND' were infringed by the Defendants' use of 'COX 5000', and the Defendants were restrained from using the impugned mark.

8 Dec 2025

The Plaintiff, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd., filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, Jagpin Brewerise Limited & Ors., fro...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)