Search Results for "Tahsildar Office"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Tahsildar Office"

1085 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1085 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses State's Appeal, Upholds Quashing of Compulsory Retirement of Tahsildar; Official Acted on Superior Officers' Written Instructions, Not Guilty of Misconduct.

18 Mar 2025

The intra-court appeal arose from a writ petition where a single judge of the Madras High Court set aside the punishment of compulsory retirement impo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion — Non-Service of Requisition Copy Not Fatal Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Service of Notice Under Section 35 Read with Rule 2 of No-Confidence Rules Held Sufficient Compliance.

8 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Amrapali Sakharam Kamble, was elected as Sarpanch of Mhasrang Gram Panchayat on 26th February 2021. She remained absent from meet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Failure to Move Resolution in Special Meeting Renders Motion Invalid and Attracts Bar Under Section 35(3-A) Against Fresh Motion for One Year.

9 Nov 2023

The petitioners, Savita Shrimant Ghule (Sarpanch) and Ganesh Vishnu Hagawne (Upa-Sarpanch) of Grampanchayat Ukkadgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Denial of Ryotwari Patta for Tank Poramboke Land. Land Classified as 'Peddacheruvu Tank' Under Section 2-A of Andhra Pradesh Inams (Abolition & Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956 Cannot Be Granted Ryotwari Patta.

14 Mar 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute over the implementation of ryotwari pattas allegedly granted in 1980 to the appellants' predecessor-in-interest for la...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Members Challenging Government Circular on Term of Committee — Statutory Rule Under Rule 14(4) of KAPM(R&D) Rules, 1968 Prevails. The court held that the term of the committee continues until the first meeting of the newly constituted committee, and a government circular cannot override the statutory rule.

13 Jun 2016

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) challenging a government c...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Validity of APMC Bye-Laws Requiring Traders to Obtain Licenses and Pay Market Fees — Held that Bye-Laws Framed Under Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 Are Statutory and Binding. Writ petitions challenging bye-laws dismissed as not maintainable without challenging the parent Act.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who are members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, filed writ petitions challenging the validity of certain bye...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Appointment of Administrator for APMC Committee — Appointment of Administrator Without Prior Notice and Without Considering Representation Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that the power under Section 121 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 must be exercised in accordance with natural justice, and failure to issue show cause notice renders the appointment invalid.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who were the President, Vice President, and members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), challenged the ap...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Administrator Appointments and Election Postponements under APMC Act. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Orders Appointing Government Officers as Administrators and Directions to Conduct Elections, While State Defended Based on Proposed Legislative Amendments and Drought Emergency.

13 Jun 2016

These writ petitions, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, were instituted by elected office bearers and members of various Agricultu...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Committee Members Challenging Government Circular Curtailing Term. Section 7(2) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 mandates continuation of committee until newly elected committee assumes office, overriding executive instructions.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, challenged a Government Circular dated 22-04-2016 that purported to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Gram Panchayat Elections — Upholds Validity of Election Process Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Court holds that election of members of Gram Panchayat cannot be challenged after declaration of results except by an election petition under Section 15 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two Letters Patent Appeals (LPA No.203 of 2011 and LPA No.204 of 2011) filed against the orders of a learned Single Judge of ...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)