Search Results for "Tahasildar"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Tahasildar"

571 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 571 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Bill Collector in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

9 Oct 2019

The appellant, Bhaskar Khashaba Yewle, was a Bill Collector in the office of Tahasildar Encroachment. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Government Order Declaring Dargah as Muslim Religious Institution. The court held that the State Government has the power to decide the character of a religious institution under Section 3 of the Karnataka Religious and Charitable Institutions (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1972, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

28 Sep 2021

The petitioner, Sri Guru Dattatreya Peeta Devasthana Samvardhana Samithi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reviews Order Granting Liberty for Caste Verification. Review Petition Challenges Applicability of Karnataka Act 1990 to Central Government Undertaking Employee and Locus Standi of Complainant.

12 Feb 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition; Revision Under Section 76 of BT & AL Act Maintainable Despite Prior Suo Motu Revision Under Section 76A. Full Bench Decision in Shireen Sami Gadiali (2011 (3) Mh.L.J. 486) Held Inapplicable as It Involved Section 154 of MCS Act, 1960, Not BT & AL Act.

21 Feb 2012

The writ petition challenged an order of the President, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Mumbai, dismissing a tenancy revision application as not maintai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in MHADA Tenement Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Right to Use New Room Allotted to Defendant. Claim of Common Baithak for Villagers Not Established as Tenancy Was in Name of Deceased Husband.

7 Mar 2005

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration and injunction in respect of a tenement of MHADA. They claimed that they, along with...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Arrest Warrant Against Managing Director in Recovery Certificate Proceedings Under MRTU & PULP Act — Personal Liability Not Established. Director Cannot Be Arrested for Company's Dues Without Lifting Corporate Veil or Establishing Personal Liability Under Sections 50-52 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

2 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Madhusudan Zumbarlal Sarda, was the Managing Director of Sarda Fashions Ltd. (later Sarda Information Technology Ltd.). Respondent Nos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Challenge to Concurrent Findings Declaring Tenant Under Section 70(b) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Scope of Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Does Not Permit Re-appreciation of Evidence to Upset Findings of Fact Unless Patent Error Causing Grave Injustice is Established.

21 Feb 2011

The dispute arose from a tenancy declaration under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, and a related land acquisition compensation ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Against Removal Under Section 39 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Upholds Minister's Order Confirming Removal for Misappropriation of Funds. Court holds that the Sarpanch's failure to deposit collected taxes and misuse of funds constitutes 'misappropriation' under Section 39(1)(b) and that the Minister's order was based on sufficient material and not perverse.

16 Mar 2016

The Petitioner, Sau. Shubhangi Sharad Gondhali, was elected as a member of the Revdanda Grampanchayat in June 2013 and subsequently elected as Sarpanc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suo Motu Revision Order Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Initiated After 48 Years — Unreasonable Delay and Lack of Notice Vitiate Proceedings. The court held that the power of suo motu revision must be exercised within a reasonable period, and a delay of 48 years is unreasonable; further, the order passed without notice to the grantee violates natural justice and is void.

9 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Mr. Ramakrishna M, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Village Panchayat Members Challenging Collector's Order Setting Aside No-Confidence Resolution Against Up-Sarpanch. The Court held that the Collector under Section 35(3B) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 cannot re-appreciate evidence or substitute his opinion on the validity of a no-confidence motion when the statutory procedure has been followed.

23 Sep 2016

The petitioners, six members of the Village Panchayat of Wadner, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Collector, Osmanabad, dated 3rd Ju...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)