Search Results for "Special Court (POCSO)"

479 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 479 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Sections 4 and 10 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant, Vitthal Rajendra Jogade, was convicted by the Special Judge, Solapur, under Section 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 5 and 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, under Sections 5 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim Was Below 18 Years.

The appellant, Kawadu Madhukar Atram, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Special (POCSO) Case 70 of 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction Under POCSO Act and IPC for Rape of 13-Year-Old. Victim's Testimony Found Reliable and Corroborated by Medical Evidence; Defence of False Implication Rejected.

The criminal appeal before the High Court arose from the conviction of the accused under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO and IPC Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible Despite Minor Inconsistencies. Medical Evidence Corroborates Sexual Assault; Extortion and Criminal Intimidation Charges Sustained Under Sections 384 and 506 IPC.

The appellant, Sandip Hariprasad Pande, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Child Protection Case No.63/2015 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC set aside as medical evidence did not support rape and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sunil Sable, was convicted by the Special Judge under POCSO Act, Dhule, for offences under Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 376(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Discharge in POCSO Case. The Court Examines the Validity of the High Court's Order that Affirmed the Discharge of School Officials Accused of Failing to Report a Sexual Assault on a Minor.

This appeal arises from a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 4772 of 2024, filed by the mother of an eight-year-old minor victim of sexual assault....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Age Proved by School Records. The court held that minor contradictions do not discredit the victim's evidence and the presumption under Section 29 POCSO Act applies.

The appellant, Akash s/o Devanand Tempe, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal (POCSO) Case No. 198/2016 for the offence pun...