Search Results for "Senior Citizens Act, 2007"

727 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 727 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Bar Bodies and Advocate, Holding Advocates Not Liable Under Consumer Protection Act. Legal Profession is Sui Generis and Excluded from Definition of 'Service' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986/2019.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which held that c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Resolves Conflict in Citizenship Rules for Assam NRC: Harmonious Construction of Sub-para (2) of Paragraph 3 and Paragraph 8 of Schedule to Citizenship Rules, 2003. Court Declines to Create Appellate Forum Under Article 142, Leaves it to Parliament and Executive.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions challenging the preparation of the National Register of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Issue of PP Act Overriding Rent Control Acts to Three-Judge Bench. Constitution Bench in Ashoka Marketing (1990) 4 SCC 406 held PP Act prevails; two-judge bench in Suhas H. Pophale (2014) 4 SCC 657 carved exceptions; conflict referred for determination.

The batch of civil appeals arose from eviction proceedings initiated by the Life Insurance Corporation of India under the Public Premises (Eviction of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Interprets Prospective vs. Retrospective Operation of Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act in Second Appeals. Court Examines Coparcenary Rights of Daughters Born Before and After 2005 Amendment and Whether Division Bench Decision Is Per Incuriam.

This matter came before a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court upon a reference by a learned Single Judge (R.G. Ketkar, J.) who doubted the correctness...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Validity of Proviso to Section 115JB(6) of Income Tax Act in SEZ Cases. The court held that the proviso inserted by Finance Act, 2011 is not ultra vires the SEZ Act and is valid and enforceable.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by companies operating in Special Economic Zones (SEZs) challenging the constitutional validity of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Challenge to Fringe Benefit Tax Provisions. Petitions question constitutional validity of Chapter XII-H of Income Tax Act, 1961 as violative of Article 14 and beyond legislative competence.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard three writ petitions filed by M/s T.T.K. Prestige Ltd. and another, M/s N. Rangarao & Sons, and Karnata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Slum Rehabilitation Area Declaration Where No Show Cause Notice Was Issued. The Court Examines Whether Principles of Natural Justice Require Opportunity of Hearing Before Section 3C(1) Declaration Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

This writ petition was filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the declaration of certain property as a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C(1...