Search Results for "Section 78(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Section 78(3)"

135 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 135 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Accused in UAPA and BNS Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 13 of UAPA — Failure to Obtain Prior Approval from Central Government Renders Investigation Invalid

1 Jul 2026

The case involves two criminal petitions filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking quashing of FIR in Cri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Directing De Novo Trial in Criminal Case Based on Procedural Irregularity in Charge Framing. The Court Held That Under Sections 464 and 465 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, a Mere Procedural Defect in Framing Charge Does Not Vitiate Trial Absent Demonstrated Prejudice or Failure of Justice, Especially When Accused Had Full Knowledge and Participated Actively for Over Fourteen Years.

25 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Interest Dispute — Interest on Delayed Possession to Run from 1 July 2016, Not 1 January 2020, But COVID Period Excluded from Interest Liability. The court held that the promoter is liable to pay interest from the date of default as per the agreement, but the COVID-19 pandemic period is excluded from interest liability.

23 Jan 2024

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. Pragatej Builders And Developers Pvt. Ltd. (the promoter) against a common judgment and order dated 7 Febr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Section 51 Notice in MRTP Act Case — Development Rights Not Extinguished by Lapse of Permission. Held that a notice under Section 51 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 cannot be issued for alleged breach of conditions when the development permission had already lapsed and the petitioner had acquired vested rights under a development agreement.

6 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Galore Developers Private Limited, entered into an agreement on 23 March 2010 with the Solapur Municipal Corporation (respondent nos.1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Ex Parte Order Restraining Husband from Entering His Own Residence in Domestic Violence Case. Order Passed Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 23(2) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

18 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Siddharth Sabharwal, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Claim Petition Beyond Limitation in Motor Accident Case — Tribunal Has Power to Entertain Delayed Claim After Omission of Section 166(3). The Court held that the omission of Section 166(3) does not affect pending claims and the Tribunal retains inherent power to condone delay.

16 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Kum. Jyoti Manohar Shetye, a socially engaged citizen employed with the Bombay Port Trust, participated in a bicycle ride from Mumbai ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

5 Mar 2019

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

30 Sep 2015

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Doctor in PCPNDT Act and MTP Act Case, Dismisses State's Application for Cancellation of Bail. The court held that the applicants were entitled to bail as the chargesheet was filed and trial would take time, and the State's application for cancellation of bail was dismissed as there was no misuse of bail.

11 Sep 2013

The judgment involves three connected criminal applications arising from the same set of facts. The first application (Cri. Appln. No. 3350/2013) was ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Reference in Income Tax Case — Remands to Tribunal for Fresh Determination on Cessation of Liability Under Section 41(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Disputed Liability for Forest Produce Price Not Ceased Merely Because Assessee Did Not Pay Pending Adjudication.

1 Feb 2010

The case involves an income tax reference by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to the Bombay High Court regarding the applicability of Section 41(1) o...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)