KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "Section 34(1)"
981 result(s) found
Found 981 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Kidnapping and Extortion Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence for Section 364A IPC. Court finds no demand for ransom or threat to kill, essential for Section 364A IPC, and grants bail under Section 439 CrPC.
1 Jul 2020The petitioner, Manjunatha @ Manju, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in Crime N...
- 61
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.
13 Jul 2026The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Direction to Register FIR Against Father of Victim in POCSO Acquittal Case — Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Compliance with Section 340 CrPC. The court held that the trial court's direction to register an FIR for perjury without following Section 340 CrPC procedure is illegal and without jurisdiction.
11 Aug 2023The appellant, Mahesh Baburao Dhavale, is the father of a minor victim girl. The accused faced trial in Special Case (POCSO) No. 155 of 2017 for offen...
- 13
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.
25 Mar 2015The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitral Award. Dispute Related to Charter Hire Agreement for Offshore Drilling, Involving Claims for Lost Equipment, Day Rates, and Demobilisation Fees.
20 Dec 2014The Bombay High Court considered an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Lt...
- 14
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Default Bail in UAPA Case: Exclusive Jurisdiction of Special Court for Extension of Investigation Period. The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC accrues upon expiry of 90 days and is not defeated by subsequent filing of charge sheet if application was made before filing.
30 Oct 2020The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Bikramjit Singh, who was arrested in connection with a grenade attack at a Nirankari Bhawan in Amritsar on 18....
- 347
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Hears Challenge to Disqualification Show Cause Notices Under Maharashtra Municipal Council Act. The court examined allegations of natural justice violation and constitutional autonomy of local bodies, but final decision is not available in the provided excerpt.
31 Oct 2018The petitioners, nine municipal councillors and the vice president of Beed Municipal Council, filed a writ petition before the Aurangabad Bench of the...
- 26
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Reservation Eligibility Dispute Under Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. Appellants, originally from unified Bihar and residing in Jharkhand post-reorganisation, are entitled to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe/Other Backward Classes reservation benefits in Jharkhand as ordinary residents, not migrants, under Articles 341(1) and 342(1) of the Constitution and Sections 23, 24, 73, 74 of Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000.
19 Aug 2021The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions challenging a High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 24th February...
- 228
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Action to Remove Unauthorized Vertical Extension in Notified Slum. Unauthorized Construction Cannot Be Protected Merely Because It Is Situated in a Slum Area.
3 Mar 2023The appellant, Mujibur Rehman Chaudhary, filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay challenging a notice dated 31 December 2019 issued by th...
- 88
