Search Results for "Saurashtra Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Saurashtra Rules"

117 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 117 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Considers Writ Petition by Regional Rural Bank Against Show Cause Notices for GST on Commission Paid to Pigmy Agents. Court Examines Whether Pigmy Agents Qualify as Employees Under Industrial Disputes Act, Thereby Exempting Their Services from GST Under CGST Act 2017 Read with Schedule III.

8 Apr 2026

The petitioner, a Regional Rural Bank established under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, challenged four show cause notices dated 27-12-2023 and 28...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition for Appointment as Civil Judge Due to Disqualification Under Rule 5(2) of Karnataka Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1977 — Marriage to a Married Man with Living Spouse Renders Candidate Ineligible for Judicial Service.

16 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Smt. Radharani Mahadev Kolambe, an advocate, applied for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) pursuant to a notification dated 1s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Petition and Income Tax Appeal for Non-Prosecution Due to Repeated Absence. Petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearings, leading to dismissal for default under Order 17 Rule 2 CPC read with Section 151 CPC.

12 Aug 2025

The petitioner, Vaibhav Maruti Dombale, filed a Writ Petition (No. 1489 of 2025) and an Income Tax Appeal (No. 21746 of 2025) before the Bombay High C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

High Court

Writ Petition Nos.4936, 6015, 6514 & 6795 of 2025 &

26 Mar 2025

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Labour Court's Jurisdiction Under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act. The Court Considers Whether a Disputed Claim of Arrears of Salary Can Be Adjudicated in a Section 33(C)(2) Proceeding Without Prior Adjudication of the Workman's Status.

13 Apr 2023

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Muslim Divorced Woman in Maintenance Case — Family Court Has Jurisdiction Under Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. High Court erred in holding that Family Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain application under Section 3 of the Act.

18 Jun 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which set aside an order of the Family Court granting maintenance to a Muslim divorced wo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Removal of Trustee in Charity Dispute — Conviction by Foreign Court Not Automatically 'Moral Turpitude' Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. Court holds that conviction by a foreign court does not ipso facto constitute an offence involving moral turpitude under Section 41D of the Act without proof of the nature of the offence.

5 Nov 2014

The case involves two appeals filed by Prabodh K. Mehta against an order of the City Civil Court dated 20 July 2013. The City Civil Court had dismisse...

High Court

KAHC010026042017_1

9 Mar 2018

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies That Appeal Under Section 72(4) of Bombay Public Trusts Act is a Regular Appeal Not Subject to Section 100 CPC Limitations. Full Bench Holds That Such Appeal Permits Full Rehearing on Both Facts and Law, Overruling Earlier Division Bench View That It is a Second Appeal Requiring Substantial Questions of Law.

1 Apr 2016

The dispute originated from two rival Change Reports filed under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, concerning the management committee of a public t...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)