Search Results for "Rule Returnable"

8513 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8513 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Defendants in Copyright Infringement Suit, Quashes Ex Parte Injunction for Non-Compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC. Trial Court Failed to Record Reasons or Issue Notice Before Granting Ex Parte Injunction, Violating Mandatory Provisions of CPC.

The petitioners, Paramvah Studios Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director Rakshit Shetty, were defendants in a suit filed by Lahari Recording Company (res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit Due to Non-Service of Summons for Judgment on Defendants' Advocate. Service on Defendants directly without prior attempt on advocate held insufficient under Order XXXVII CPC.

The petitioners, original defendants in Summary Suit No.4914 of 2012, challenged the order dated 08.07.2013 passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes SVLDRS-3 Statement for Non-Adjustment of Pre-deposits in Service Tax Dispute. Petitioner's pre-deposits and recovered amounts must be adjusted before demanding payment under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.

The petitioner, Evershine Enterprises, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking to quash the SVLDRS-3 statement issued by the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Pharmaceutical and Polyester Manufacturers for LBT Exemption Under Rule 28(6) of BPMC (LBT) Rules, 2010. Court Holds That Exemption for Goods Used in Export Covers All Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exported Finished Products, Irrespective of Place of Processing.

These three connected writ petitions filed by pharmaceutical and polyester manufacturing companies challenged the orders of the Aurangabad Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Furlough Condition in Maharashtra Prisons Rules as Unconstitutional. Residence-based classification for furlough eligibility violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Tenant Eviction Case — Bonafide Requirement and Lapse of Lease Term Upheld. The concurrent findings of fact by the trial court and appellate court were not shown to be perverse or illegal, and the revision was dismissed.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendant (tenant) against the respondent (original plaintiff/landlord) challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Writ Petition Against Tender Disqualification in Hospital PPP Project. Bid Rejected as Non-Responsive Due to Asterisks and Alleged Violation of Finance Department Concurrence Rules Under Rules of Business of the Government of Goa, 1991.

The writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa arose out of a tender process for the development, operation and management of a 290-bedded D...