Bombay High Court Quashes SVLDRS-3 Statement for Non-Adjustment of Pre-deposits in Service Tax Dispute. Petitioner's pre-deposits and recovered amounts must be adjusted before demanding payment under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 36
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Evershine Enterprises, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking to quash the SVLDRS-3 statement issued by the respondents on 26 December 2019 under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. The petitioner contended that the amounts already recovered from it or pre-deposited by it were not adjusted while determining the amount payable under the scheme. The background facts reveal that on 13 June 2013, the petitioner was served with a show-cause notice cum demand notice proposing a service tax demand of Rs.2,25,31,804/- for the period 2008-2009 to 2011-2012. The petitioner responded on 9 December 2013, pointing out that a major portion of the demand had already been remitted before the issuance of the notice. Subsequently, another show-cause notice cum demand notice dated 28 March 2014 was issued demanding service tax of Rs.17,04,400/- along with interest and penalty for the period 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013. On 27 March 2018, the 3rd respondent passed an Order-in-Original confirming the demands proposed in both show-cause notices. The petitioner then sought to avail the SVLDRS scheme, but the SVLDRS-3 statement did not account for the amounts already paid. The court, after hearing the parties, issued rule and made it returnable immediately. The court quashed the SVLDRS-3 statement and directed the respondents to recompute the amount payable after adjusting the amounts already recovered or pre-deposited by the petitioner. The court also directed that the petitioner be given a fresh opportunity to pay the recomputed amount within four weeks, and upon such payment, the respondents were to issue the necessary discharge certificate.

Headnote

A) Service Tax - Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - Adjustment of Pre-deposits - The petitioner challenged the SVLDRS-3 statement dated 26 December 2019 on the ground that amounts already recovered or pre-deposited were not adjusted in determining the payable amount. The court held that such adjustment is necessary and quashed the statement, directing the respondents to recompute the amount after adjusting the pre-deposits and recovered amounts. (Paras 3-6)

B) Service Tax - Show Cause Notice - Confirmation of Demand - The petitioner was served with show-cause notices dated 13 June 2013 and 28 March 2014 demanding service tax. The Order-in-Original dated 27 March 2018 confirmed the demands. The petitioner had already remitted a major portion before the first notice. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the amounts already recovered from the petitioner or pre-deposited by the petitioner ought to have been adjusted in determining the amount payable under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, and whether the SVLDRS-3 statement issued without such adjustment is liable to be quashed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the SVLDRS-3 statement dated 26 December 2019 and directed the respondents to recompute the amount payable after adjusting the amounts already recovered or pre-deposited by the petitioner. The petitioner was given four weeks to pay the recomputed amount, and upon payment, the respondents were to issue the necessary discharge certificate.

Law Points

  • Adjustment of pre-deposits
  • SVLDRS Scheme
  • Service Tax
  • Natural Justice
  • Recovery
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-OS:20652-DB

Writ Petition No. 3138 of 2022

2025-11-03

M.S. Sonak, Advait M. Sethna

2025:BHC-OS:20652-DB

Bharat Raichandani, Bhagrati Sahu i/b. Prabhakar Shetty for Petitioner; P.C. Cardozo a/w Mamta Omle for Respondent No.3

Evershine Enterprises

Union of India through Secretary Ministry of Finance & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of SVLDRS-3 statement.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of SVLDRS-3 statement dated 26 December 2019 and direction to adjust pre-deposits and recovered amounts.

Filing Reason

Non-adjustment of amounts already recovered or pre-deposited by the petitioner in the SVLDRS-3 statement.

Previous Decisions

Order-in-Original dated 27 March 2018 confirming service tax demands.

Issues

Whether the SVLDRS-3 statement is liable to be quashed for non-adjustment of pre-deposits and recovered amounts.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that amounts already recovered or pre-deposited were not adjusted in the SVLDRS-3 statement. Respondents opposed the petition, but the court found merit in the petitioner's contention.

Ratio Decidendi

Under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, amounts already recovered or pre-deposited by the assessee must be adjusted before determining the amount payable. Failure to do so renders the SVLDRS-3 statement unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner seeks to quash the statement issued by the Respondents to form SVLDRS-3 dated 26 December 2019 (Exh.A) primarily on the ground that the amounts already recovered from the Petitioner or the amounts predeposited by the Petitioner were not adjusted in determining the amount which the Petitioner has been called upon to pay under SVLDRS-3. We quash the SVLDRS-3 statement dated 26 December 2019 and direct the Respondents to recompute the amount payable after adjusting the amounts already recovered or pre-deposited by the Petitioner.

Procedural History

The petitioner was served with show-cause notices in 2013 and 2014. An Order-in-Original was passed on 27 March 2018 confirming the demands. The petitioner then filed a writ petition in 2022 challenging the SVLDRS-3 statement issued on 26 December 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019:
  • Finance Act, 1994:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes SVLDRS-3 Statement for Non-Adjustment of Pre-deposits in Service Tax Dispute. Petitioner's pre-deposits and recovered amounts must be adjusted before demanding payment under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Vi...