Search Results for "Rule 10(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Rule 10(3)"

1928 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1928 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Held that Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and is Not Barred by Limitation. The court held that the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC as the suit is within limitation and discloses a cause of action.

16 Jul 2016

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by Defendant No. 11, Lily Realty Private Limited, in a suit for specific performance and injunction. The pl...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Challenge to Arbitral Award in Reclamation Work Contract Dispute. Petition Filed Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking to Set Aside Award for Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

1 Apr 2015

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Charge Under Section 229(A) IPC for Theft of Electricity Due to Lack of Sanction. Prosecution Failed to Obtain Mandatory Consent Under Section 50 of Indian Electricity Act, 1910 Before Framing Additional Charge.

17 Aug 2010

The applicants, Uddhavrao Nivrutti Sarkale, Markand Uddhavrao Sarkale, and Sau. Anandibai Uddhavrao Sarkale, were accused in RCC No.381/2001 pending b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment in Specific Performance Suit to Include Alternative Relief of Refund of Advance Sale Consideration. Amendment Sought Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Must Be Liberally Allowed to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings and Does Not Change Nature of Suit.

8 Jun 2021

The petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract in O.S.No.103/2014 before the Senior Civil Judge, Chikodi. During the pende...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes E-Auction Notice and Sale Certificate in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Violation of Rule 8(6) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. Failure to Serve 30-Day Notice Before Auction Renders Sale Void.

14 Dec 2022

The petitioners, Sri T.S. Nataraj, Sri Harsha N., and Smt. N. Seema, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bef...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Deputy Collector's Order in Land Record Correction Case — Section 103 of Goa Land Revenue Code Cannot Be Used for Adjudication of Title Disputes. The Deputy Collector's order deleting the name of the predecessor-in-title and substituting the respondent's name was held to be beyond the scope of clerical error correction under Section 103 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code, 1968.

16 Feb 2022

The petitioners, legal heirs of Joseph Paulo, challenged an order dated 24.01.1995 passed by the Deputy Collector under Section 103 of the Goa, Daman ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order in Transport Department Recruitment Matter. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution Seek Quashing of Tribunal's Decision Dated 02.03.2010.

23 Sep 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against AGRC Order Reinstating Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner Society Challenges AGRC Order that Set Aside SRA De-clubbing and Reinstated Developer Despite Alleged Non-compliance with Mandatory NOC from MHADA Under DCR 33(10) and Section 13(2) Proceedings.

7 Jul 2023

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by a co-operative housing society an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order in Suit for Specific Performance — Petitioner Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Interim Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

8 Jul 2025

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original plaintiff Smt. Venkamma Namasivayam, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witness for Cross-Examination in Sessions Case — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to Cross-Examine PW1 Despite Delay. The court set aside the trial court's order rejecting recall of witness under Section 311 CrPC, holding that fair trial requires opportunity to cross-examine, subject to costs.

31 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Murlidhar Kapile, original accused no.3 in Sessions Case No. 35/2012, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of ...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)