Search Results for "Retiral benefits"

505 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 505 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Lecturer in Career Advancement Scheme Case. Recovery of Excess Payment Without Fault of Employee Held Unjust Under Government Resolution Dated 27.02.1989.

The petitioner, Mrs. Z.H. Lamak, a retired Lecturer, challenged an order dated 31.07.1996 directing recovery of Rs.1,04,989/- from her terminal/retira...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Pension Dispute Under Bipartite Settlement and Pension Regulations. Employee Removed for Misconduct Entitled to Pension as Appellate Order Granting Terminal Benefits Attained Finality and He Completed Minimum Pensionable Service.

The dispute arose from the removal of an employee from service by United Commercial Bank following a disciplinary enquiry that found him guilty of rio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Retiral Benefits Against APMC. Court Directs Payment of Provident Fund, Leave Encashment, and Salary Differences as Per Seventh Pay Commission, Upholding Order of District Deputy Registrar.

The petitioner, Laxman Vitthalrao Motegaonkar, was appointed as Junior Clerk by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Sangamner, on 09.09....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Laboratory Attendant to Continue Till 60 Years Following Precedent in Samadhan Rajaram Umak Case. Group D Employee of Agricultural University Entitled to Retirement at 60 Years Under Service Rules.

The petitioner, Rambhau Shaymrao Bhusari, was appointed as a Laboratory Attendant at Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, in 1980. He was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Regularization of Suspension Period and Retiral Benefits for Teacher in Service Law Matter. Period of Suspension Treated as Duty for Pension and Other Benefits Under Articles 14, 16, and 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sudha Menendbhai Odedra, was appointed as a Vidya Sahayak (teacher) on 14/03/1989 and later promoted to Principal of a higher secondar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Employer's Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Under Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (MVRS). Resignation Submitted Under MVRS Was Unconditional and Could Not Be Withdrawn After Acceptance, as Per Scheme Terms Under Clause 5.1.

The dispute arose from the respondent's resignation under the Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (MVRS) introduced by the appellants, a public secto...