Search Results for "Rent Act amendment"

1062 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1062 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State to Enhance Royalty/Dead Rent in Mining Leases Despite Absence of Express Clause. Statutory Provisions Under Section 15(3) of MMDR Act and Rules 10 and 21 of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964 Impliedly Authorize Enhancement During Subsistence of Lease.

The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Haryana against judgments of the Punjab and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition in Rent Control Dispute Over Subletting and Bona Fide Requirement. Landlord Failed to Prove Illegal Subletting and Bona Fide Need for Suit Property Under Bombay Rent Act.

The petitioner, Milind Rajkumar Wagholikar (Shah), was the landlord of a suit property bearing CTS No. 506/34, new CTS No. 866, admeasuring about 7500...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Written Statement in Rent Suit Pending for 21 Years. Amendment Allowed Subject to Costs as No Irretrievable Prejudice Caused to Plaintiff.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original plaintiff Morarji Hariram (since deceased), filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Sub-Tenant in Rent Control Matter. Sub-tenant with paid-up capital less than Rs 1 crore held entitled to protection under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 despite tenant's exclusion under Section 3(1)(b).

The case involves a dispute over the applicability of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 to a sub-tenant. The applicant, Frick India Ltd, claimed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...