Search Results for "Reconstruction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "Reconstruction"

948 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 948 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction of Property Under MPID Act — Petitioner Cannot Challenge Auction After Being Declared Successful Bidder. Court Held That Petitioner's Own Conduct of Participating in Auction with Knowledge of Attachments and Seeking Specific Performance Before MPID Court Precludes Challenge Under Article 226.

25 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Lemon Seeds Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

23 Aug 2022

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Case on Appointment of Advocate as Commissioner. The Court held that a District Magistrate or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate can appoint an advocate to take possession of secured assets under Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as an advocate is considered an officer of the court subordinate to the Magistrate.

25 Feb 2022

The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Closes Contempt Petitions Against Alchemist for Non-Payment of Rs. 4.5 Crores to Kotak Mahindra Bank, Directs Payment Subject to High Court Determination. The Court held that the order dated 07.05.2012 was binding until modified, and Alchemist's failure to pay constituted disobedience, but since the amount was deposited, no contempt action was taken.

23 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court of India disposed of contempt petitions filed by Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited (KMBL) against Alchemist Assets Reconstruction Company ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds CRZ Violations in Maradu Municipality Construction Case — Coastal Zone Management Authority's Powers Affirmed. Construction in CRZ-III No Development Zone Without Prior Concurrence of Authority Violates Environment Protection Act, 1986 and CRZ Notification 1991.

8 May 2019

The appeals were filed by the Kerala State Coastal Zone Management Authority (KCZMA) against the judgment of the Kerala High Court which had allowed w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MHADA's Refusal to Register Proposed Cooperative Housing Society Under Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976 — Held That a Proposed Society Is Entitled to Seek Registration and the Authority Cannot Refuse on Grounds of Non-Completion of Construction.

26 Mar 2015

The petitioners, Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-op. Housing Society (proposed) and its promoters, along with Darshan Developers, filed a wr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Receiver Appointment Plea in Redevelopment Dispute — Oral Contract Not Enforceable Under Specific Relief Act. Court holds that an oral agreement for redevelopment of a co-operative housing society, even if evidenced by resolutions, is not specifically enforceable under Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and that appointment of a receiver under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is not warranted when the plaintiff has no legal right to possession.

12 Nov 2014

The plaintiff, Mangal Milan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a suit seeking specific performance of an oral contract for redevelopment of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Appointment of Court Receiver for Possession of Flats for Demolition and Reconstruction. Court holds that disputes regarding redevelopment of a cooperative housing society are not arbitrable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as they involve statutory rights and obligations under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

18 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Bharat Infrastructure and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Pre-deposit Condition Under SARFAESI Act — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 18 Provisos. The court held that the legislature may condition the right of appeal and the provisions are not discriminatory compared to the RDB Act.

1 Jul 2011

The petitioners, National Polymers and others, challenged an order dated 6 April 2011 of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal directing them to depos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Demolition by Municipal Corporation in Land Dispute Over Survey No.123, Hissa 1A. Appellants' Right to Reconstruction Upheld After Wrongful Demolition During Subsistence of Interim Order.

17 Nov 2005

The case involves two appeals filed by Chotelal Ramkaran Yadav and Jaggu Chauthi Yadav against the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai. The appel...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)