Search Results for "Rashness and Negligence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Rashness and Negligence"

328 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 328 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence of Offending Vehicle Driver — Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Ground of Contributory Negligence Without Evidence. The Court held that the Tribunal's finding of contributory negligence was without any evidence and set aside the dismissal, remanding for fresh consideration on quantum.

25 Sep 2019

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, who are the legal heirs of deceased Rajendra Kothari, challenging the Judgment and Award dated...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved, No Breach of Policy Conditions. The court upheld the award of Rs.6,04,000/- with 9% interest for death of a passenger in a jeep accident, rejecting the insurer's contention of contributory negligence and lack of valid driving license.

3 Mar 2026

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of deceased Rakeshbhai Nanjibhai, who died in a jeep accident on 16.04.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Doctors in Medical Negligence Case — No Prima Facie Case Under Section 304A IPC. Allegations of Rash or Negligent Act Not Made Out as Treatment Was Given in Good Faith and No Gross Negligence Established.

6 Jul 2017

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench heard two criminal applications filed by Dr. Pradeep Sadashiv Wankhede and Dr. Abhishek Vasantrao Sondawale, bot...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge Petition in Medical Negligence Case Under Section 304A IPC — Lack of Material to Show Rash or Negligent Act. Court holds that death during anaesthesia without evidence of gross negligence does not constitute culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

17 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Dr. Suvarna Arjun Jaybhaye, a medical practitioner with an MBBS degree and a diploma in Anaesthesia, was the accused in S.C.C. No. 965...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Head Constable's Dependents Awarded Enhanced Amount with Interest. Negligence of Trax Cruiser Driver Established; Tribunal's Finding of Contributory Negligence Set Aside Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

25 Feb 2014

The appellants, being the widow, children, and mother of deceased Ganesh Khanjode, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Motor Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash Driving. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 Motor Vehicles Act as No Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving Was Adduced.

15 Feb 2017

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 16 April 19...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Reiterates Legal Standards for Motor Accident Claims and Criticizes Tribunal's Dismissal Without Deciding Quantum. Court emphasizes preponderance of probability, not proof beyond reasonable doubt, under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 169(2) and precedent requiring all issues be decided.

8 Dec 2022

The first appeal arose from a judgment and award dated 25 August 2021 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which dismissed Claim Petition No. 53 of ...

High Court

High Court of Kerala Hears Criminal Appeal of Accused Convicted Under Sections 279 and 337 IPC and Section 146 r/w 196 MV Act in Fatal Road Accident Case. Accused Challenged Identity as Rider and Conviction, While Court Examined Whether Section 304A IPC Could Be Convicted Without Charge.

3 Aug 2026

The appeal arose from the judgment dated 21.06.2016 in S.C.No.648/2013 of the First Additional Sessions Court, Ernakulam, whereby the sole accused was...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC set aside as sole eyewitness did not testify that the bus was driven rashly or negligently.

21 Oct 2024

The applicant, Shivaji Damodar Karne, a bus driver employed with BEST, was convicted by the trial court (28th Esplanade Court, Mumbai) in CC No.40/P/9...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Discharge of Accused in School Van Accident Case — No Prima Facie Case of Rash or Negligent Driving. Court holds that mere involvement in an accident does not establish rash or negligent driving under Sections 279, 304-A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act.

6 Sep 2018

The present criminal revision was filed by the complainant, Ashok Tarachand Ramteke, challenging the order of the Sessions Judge, Wardha, who discharg...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)