Search Results for "Railway Rates Tribunal jurisdiction"

143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute Over Dewatering Claims. Court sets aside majority award's rejection of dewatering claim for additional stretch, remits for fresh consideration.

The Petitioner, an Austrian contracting company, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 11 July 2007 that dismissed its claim for payment of dewat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum Reducing Compensation under National Highways Act, 1956. Competent Authority Lacks Power to Review Award; Section 33 of Right to Fair Compensation Act Not Applicable Absent Notification Under Section 105(3).

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged a corrigendum issued by the Competent Authority under the National Highways Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Arbitration Case. Court upholds arbitral award allowing contractor's claims for hidden expenses and interest, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Irrigation Department, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award on Regularisation of Canteen Workers. Contract Labour System Upheld as Genuine, Not a Sham, and Workers Not Entitled to Direct Employment by Principal Employer.

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by Contract Laghu Udyog Kamgar Union challenging an award of the Industrial Tribunal dated 19th March 2...