Search Results for "Prosecutrix testimony"

516 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 516 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconclusive.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Sudhakar Domaji Hazare and Prafulla @ Pravin Anandrao Sangidwar, under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecutrix's sole testimony found unreliable as her version was contradictory and medical evidence did not support rape allegations under Section 376(2)(n) IPC.

The appellant, original informant, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and order of ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(xi) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appellant, Bashir Beg, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati, in Special Case 2 of 2005 for offences under Sections 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconclusive.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 452, 406, and 506 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The appellants, Satish Say...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not establish rape.

The appellant, Suresh Karbhari Wadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 506 (crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony lacked corroboration and delay in lodging FIR was not satisfactorily explained.

The appellant, Mansing Nana Shinde, was convicted by the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the offence of rape under Section 376 of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Contradictory Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Onkar Timaji Shende, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Raping Minor Daughter Under POCSO Act and IPC. Court Relies on Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence to Affirm Conviction Under Sections 376(2), 313 IPC and Sections 5(j)(ii)(l)(n) r/w 6 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Samji s/o Isarya Gavit, was convicted by the Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 16 of 2015 for offences under Section 376(2) and Secti...