Search Results for "Promoters and Builders Association"

114 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Earth Without Permission in Construction Project. Excavation for Foundation Laying and Backfilling Does Not Amount to 'Illegal Excavation' Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioner, M/s BGR Energy Systems Limited, was awarded a contract by Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited (MAHAGENCO) for construct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MoU Dispute Over Flat Area — Petitioner's Obligation to Sell 1 Lac Sq. Ft. Upheld. Arbitrator's Plausible Interpretation of Contract Not Interfered With Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by The Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. challenging an arbitral award passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Petitioners Challenging Competent Authority's Orders Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 -- Petitioners Fail to Establish Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice

The judgment involves four connected writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging orders passed by the Competent Aut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Public Interest Litigations in Road Development Contract Dispute. Reiterates Stringent Locus Standi Requirements Under Article 226 to Prevent Abuse of Process by Meddlesome Bystanders.

The Bombay High Court examined the maintainability of multiple public interest litigations and writ petitions concerning the Kolhapur Integrated Road ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC — Plaint Cannot Be Rejected After Framing of Issues. Suit for Specific Performance Under MOFA Not Barred by Limitation as Limitation is a Mixed Question of Law and Fact.

The appellant, Mrs. Sicily Varghese Kadamthottu, filed a suit for specific performance against the respondents, who were promoters under the Maharasht...