Search Results for "Preliminary Issue"

5261 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5261 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Orders for Lack of Jurisdiction — Orders Passed Without Deciding Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Are Illegal. Trial Court Must First Decide Preliminary Issue of Jurisdiction Before Proceeding with Interim Applications.

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders dated 13.04.2017 and 17.07.2017 passed by the X...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Petition Challenging MACT Order on Preliminary Issue in Motor Accident Claim. Subrogation Rights of Insurer Upheld Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The New India Assurance Company Limited, the insurer of the offending lorry (bearing no. NL 05 A 1062), filed a writ petition challenging an order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Trial Court's Valuation of Suit for Declaration and Injunction Under Karnataka Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, 1958 — Suit for Declaration That Sale Deed Is Null and Void Is Properly Valued Under Section 26(c) Read with Section 24(d) of the Act.

The defendant filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30.7.2013 passed by the I Addit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Suit for Specific Performance — Territorial Jurisdiction Issue Deferred to Trial. Court holds that preliminary issue of jurisdiction requires evidence and cannot be decided without trial under Order XVIII Rule 4 CPC.

The suit was filed by Dr. Ashok M. Bhat and another against Harichand Nagpal and another for specific performance of an agreement to sell. The prelimi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Suit, Reverses Trial Court's Finding of Res Judicata. The court held that the earlier suit was not between the same parties and the subject matter was different, thus the bar of res judicata under Section 11 CPC did not apply.

The appellant, Ashok Patil, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Conductor's Petition Challenging Dismissal Order in Misappropriation Case. Labour Court's finding that domestic enquiry was fair and findings were not perverse upheld by Industrial Court and High Court.

The petitioner, a conductor employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, was charged with misappropriating Rs. 58 by issuing blank pa...