Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Act 1988 Section 166"

1016 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1016 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Deceased Driver's Income Exceeds Threshold Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claim Under Section 163A Not Maintainable as Deceased's Annual Income Exceeded Rs.40,000/- Limit Prescribed Under Second Schedule.

The appellants, legal heirs of deceased Kailas Vithal Nanaware, filed a claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by Owner of Uninsured Truck in Motor Accident Claim. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.82,200 to Rs.1,50,000 for Death of Pillion Rider Due to Rash Driving Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident on 22/2/1995 where Nirmala, a 57-year-old woman, died as a pillion rider on a moped after being hit by a truck. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Claimant in Motor Vehicle Accident Case on Territorial Jurisdiction Grounds. Territorial Jurisdiction Objection Overruled as Procedural Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Following Precedent in Malati Sardar v. National Insurance Company Ltd.

The appeal arose from a motor vehicle accident where the appellant's son died after being hit by a tractor driven recklessly by the first respondent. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Claimant's Deceased Was Driving Without Valid License and Was Negligent, Reducing Insurer's Liability Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal arises out of a judgment and award dated 06-08-2009 passed by the Additional MACT, Srirangapatna, in MVC No.848/2003, whereby the petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claims for Rider of Motorcycle Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act. Rider Held Not Entitled to Full Compensation as Liability Limited to Contractual Personal Accident Cover of Rs.1,00,000.

The case involved a fatal motorcycle accident on 08.12.2007 where the rider lost control and collided with a roadside stone, resulting in the death of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Motor Vehicle Under Repair at Garage is 'Use' for Purposes of Compensation Liability Under Motor Vehicles Act. Court Clarifies That Vehicles Stationed for Repair Fall Within Section 147 Liability, Rejecting Insurer's Narrow Interpretation of 'Use'.

The appeal arose from an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, awarding compensation of Rs. 8,26,000 with interest to the dependents of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...